Reviewable
Trag
Phabricator
Gerrit Code Review
Review Board
GitHub
SonarQube
BitBucket
BoxyHQ
Skyflow
Auth0
Frontegg
Okta
CipherStash
Microsoft Azure Active Directory
Keycloak
SaaS, Premium Self-Hosted, or FREE OSS Self-Hosted
Enterprise Single Sign On (SSO) SAML SSO enables a secure authentication via an organization’s Identity Provider (IdP), as opposed to users or IT admins managing thousands, of usernames and passwords. With our product SAML Jackson, enterprise users can access your product via one of their secure IdPs (like Okta, Microsoft Azure, AWS, etc), which manages access and security for the entire organization.
Directory Sync Organizations use directories from different providers to manage users and enforce their access to organization resources. By integrating our Directory Sync product into your solution you can activate and deactivate user accounts, create groups, and keep your app in sync with the user directory in real-time. Supports the SCIM 2.0 protocol.
Additionally, we offer Audit Logs to track critical events in your application and a Data Privacy Vault to safeguard sensitive data.
Reviewable BoxyHQBoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for its comprehensive suite of security building blocks tailored specifically for developers. With features like SAML/OIDC Single Sign-On (SSO) and Directory Sync with SCIM 2.0, BoxyHQ simplifies identity management and access control for B2B SaaS companies. Its focus on providing a seamless and customizable solution empowers developers to enhance security without compromising user experience. Additionally, BoxyHQ offers Audit Logs to track critical events within the product and a Privacy Vault, an API to protect sensitive data.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for several reasons:
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ's primary audience encompasses:
BoxyHQ's answer:
The inception of BoxyHQ is deeply linked with Deepak's journey as the former CTO of a cybersecurity scaleup. In his role, Deepak wrestled with the challenge of allocating resources to enterprise compliance features that diverged from their core value proposition. Alongside Sama, they witnessed the escalating tide of cyber crimes, compounded by the concerning statistic that around 70% of development teams often bypass essential security measures due to time constraints. Motivated by this shared purpose of bringing security earlier in the developer live cycle, they embarked on a mission to address these challenges head-on. BoxyHQ emerged as a solution designed to automate product security and provide low-code APIs for seamless integration, empowering developers to implement enterprise-compliant security measures effortlessly. Through BoxyHQ, Deepak and the team strive to alleviate the burden on development teams while fortifying organizations against the escalating threats posed by cyber crimes.
BoxyHQ's answer:
We value the confidentiality of our large enterprise clients due to NDA agreements. However, some of our notable customers include Cal.com, Dub, Supademo, Spike, among many others.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ uses the following technologies: - Next.js - PostgreSQL - Docker - Kubernetes
Based on our record, Reviewable seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Trag - Review your PR in minutes, not days.
Skyflow - Skyflow’s data privacy vaults deliver security, compliance and governance via a simple API
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
Frontegg - Elegant user management, tailor-made for B2B SaaS