Trust me, at least on Intel, you do not want to write assembly inside your C/C++ code, unless it's just a couple of lines. The usual AT&T syntax will drive you nuts, and the additional syntax for embedding assembly only adds to the misery. For any reasonable amounts (say, you want a function or several) of assembly, you want Intel syntax and standalone assembly files. NASM is a great tool, although YASM should... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Things like yasm only have tasm support...not sure if that will be enough in your case. Source: about 2 years ago

Can also recommend the rewrite of NASM, YASM. https://yasm.tortall.net/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

In conclusion, none of the proposed changes to the Ruby version of the code makes a dent in the Crystal version. This is not entirely Crystal's doing: it uses the LLVM backend, which generates very optimized binaries. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago

This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago

'Computer Architeture: A Quantitative Apporach" and/or more specific design types (mips, arm, etc) can be found under the Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Architeture and Design. "Getting Started with LLVM Core Libraries: Get to Grips With Llvm Essentials and Use the Core Libraries to Build Advanced Tools " "The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) : LLVM" https://aosabook.org/en/v1/llvm.html... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

You can never mistake type_declaration with an identifier, otherwise the program will not work. Aside from that constraint, you are free to name them whatever you like, there is no one standard, and each parser has it own naming conventions, unless you are planning to use something like LLVM. If you are interested, you can see examples of naming in different language parsers in the AST Explorer. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

C++ compiler which compiles the Rust as if it were C++ (LLVM). Source: 6 months ago