Simplicity
The C4 model promotes a simple and clear approach for visualizing software architecture by limiting the number of diagram types and focusing on different levels of detail, making it easy to understand and use.
Scalability
The C4 model scales well with systems of varying complexity, offering different levels of abstraction (Context, Container, Component, and Code) tailored to different audiences and detailed needs.
Clarity of Communication
By dividing the representation of the system into different levels, the C4 model improves communication among stakeholders by providing the right level of detail to the right audience.
Standardization
The model introduces a standard way to create architecture diagrams, making it easier to maintain consistency and understandability across different teams and projects.
Focus on Architecture
C4 places a strong emphasis on architectural elements without becoming tied into specific tooling or technology choices, thus focusing on high-level designs rather than low-level implementation details.
Promote C4 model. You can add any of these badges on your website.
For the architectural documentation like this one, the C4 Model [0] is a much better fit than UML - primarily because it's less rigid in notation and modeling components. And in terms of tooling, I find IcePanel [1] to have the right combination of flexibility and simplicity. [0] https://c4model.com/ [1] https://icepanel.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago
Instead, inspired by the C4 model of visualizing software, I've explored a component based approach, where an application consists of multiple components that interact with each other. These components aren't classified into any particular layer (except, maybe the presentation layer and application layer). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
I’m surprised no one has mentioned the C4 approach to diagramming yet, which is a prescriptive approach that helps to avoid most of these mistakes: https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Start by formalizing the architecture. You don’t need heavy enterprise methodologies like TOGAF; use formats that fit the team and product. Frameworks like arc42 are suitable for complex systems, while simpler projects may only need C4 diagrams supplemented with a few additional visualizations. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Software Architecture is all about developing systems that scale and are maintainable. Clear visualizations will help teams to communicate the design effectively. The C4 model comes in handy for this task! But what is C4, and why should you care? - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Https://c4model.com/ is very useful for this. :-) I've told it before, but when we were doing some clean sheet work a while ago I decided to use the C4 model and drew out the obligatory "Context" diagram with "user" "phone" "laptop" "app" sort of stuff... And then two hours later realized that because we had both an online and a semi-disconnected mobile app that could be offline, certain things -had- to use a... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
What sort of maps are you wanting to build? https://c4model.com/ seems to be the more popular standard for this style at the moment. https://github.com/plantuml-stdlib/C4-PlantUML makes this somewhat easy to code out. (And I think most cloud providers have addons for it.). - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Could you define "best"? I think it depends on your requirements. There are many tools available. Here are some I suggest. * Excalidraw https://excalidraw.com/ * The C4 model https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
C4 modelling (with associated diagrams using whatever tools) can be powerful, part of the value is that they help capture the nested and relational nature of many software systems. https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
As others have said the C4 model is a great way to address a number of these issues. I can’t find the right video at the moment but Simon Brown (creator of C4) gives a great talk about creating his DSL, Structurizr, for C4, which he developed during COVID lockdown (if memory serves). There are many videos on YouTube of Simon talking about “C4 Models as Code” so I’m sure any one of those will suffice. The focus is... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
It sounded like it was working up to a C4 pitch but never got there. It bears a look exactly for this post's title. https://c4model.com. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Maybe checkout https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Simon Brown is another person who has done a far better job than me of "democratizing" software architecture for developers. His talks [1] and workshops on architecture are exceptionally effective and his C4 architecture modeling language [2] is getting real traction. I have youtube videos too [3] but they aren't as effective. [1] https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=simon+brown+architecture [2]... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Keep it simple and use https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Second this. Reference for anyone looking I to it: https://c4model.com/ There is also quite a lot of options for helping create these diagrams. I've found https://structurizr.com/ to be the best of what I've tried so far. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
What you are describing sounds a lot like C4: https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
The C4 model [0] provides a mostly sensible structure and techniques for representing pure software systems across different abstraction levels. For systems involving software and hardware, or other complex interfacing (both technology and bureaucracy) this starts to delve into the universe of systems engineering. There's a decent assembly of knowledge on that in the SEBoK [1]. As another commenter has already... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
There a various standards for documenting software architecture, like arc42 or C4. While useful and somewhat well-known (there is certainly a correlation here), here architecture documentation can be further simplified, particularly due to the self-similarity of project and component. Following is a small template, that can also serve as a project's and component's README:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I would suggest that if your architecture diagrams are a bunch of icons provided by AWS/Azure/GCP with lines pointing at each other... You are doing it wrong. The 'what does this box do for my system' is vastly more important than the 'which in vogue offering from my cloud provider implements it'. I highly suggest folks take a look at the C4 Model: https://c4model.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
We often use abstractions in software engineering to communicate complex architectures and software systems. In this article, we’ll discuss how abstractions are inherently hierarchical and how the C4 model provides a nested structure for defining your software architecture. We’ll then cover how IcePanel allows you to create interactive and zoomable diagrams for your audience to zoom in and out of different levels... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
You probably want https://c4model.com/ which explains what a C4 architecture diagram is. (See the first footnote in the article.). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Do you know an article comparing C4 model to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about C4 model. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.