Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

100 UI/UX Tips VS SCons

Compare 100 UI/UX Tips VS SCons and see what are their differences

100 UI/UX Tips logo 100 UI/UX Tips

This is a collection of Dos and Dont's for making your UI better.

SCons logo SCons

SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.
  • 100 UI/UX Tips Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-03
  • SCons Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21

100 UI/UX Tips videos

No 100 UI/UX Tips videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SCons videos

Review Scons Bañados Dia %

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to 100 UI/UX Tips and SCons)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager

User comments

Share your experience with using 100 UI/UX Tips and SCons. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SCons seems to be a lot more popular than 100 UI/UX Tips. While we know about 15 links to SCons, we've tracked only 1 mention of 100 UI/UX Tips. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

100 UI/UX Tips mentions (1)

  • Show HN: I made a book with a hundred UI/UX tips
    Hello. This year I dived into UI/UX area and at the same time I work as a web developer. I sincerely love making good UI. But at my full time job it's not always possible due to different reasons =\ So I've been posting random UI/UX staff on Twitter, then I made a free book that had 50 tips (posted it here as well). I decided to finish this year by collecting everything I learned and here it is:... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

SCons mentions (15)

  • Tired of Makefiles
    Has anyone tried SCONS? Came across someone using it in a place where I worked earlier. Python-based make-like tool. https://scons.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Jeeves – A Pythonic Alternative to GNU Make
    The most comprehensive make alternative in python I've seen is Scons (https://scons.org/) It would be worth to see how they tackles some of the challenges you're looking into. Blurb from the website: SCons is an Open Source software construction tool. Think of SCons as an improved, cross-platform substitute for the classic Make utility with integrated functionality similar to autoconf/automake and compiler caches... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Taskfile: A Modern Alternative to Makefile
    Https://scons.org/ It has cache facility to speed up re-builds. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    SCons never got popular enough to escape the niches it grew up in. Source: 12 months ago
  • Is it possible to dynamically introduce nodes inside the project
    I literally do almost this exact thing with the game im working on. Situation is: im the programmer, working with an artist who cant code (and im not going to make them edit json on an ipad lmao) so I have a google drive spreadsheet where they put metadata for the items they make. I have a script that uses rclone to copy this down as a csv, along with the image assets. Then I wrote a python extension for scons... Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing 100 UI/UX Tips and SCons, you can also consider the following products

UserInterface.io - Weekly UI/UX tips in your inbox for free

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

50 UI Tips - Improve your UI/UX skills in an hour, for free

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

100 days of SEO - An actionable SEO tip to your inbox each day

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.