960 Grid System
Bootstrap
Unsemantic CSS Framework
Bulma
Flat UI Pro
HTML5 Boilerplate
Amazium
Materialize CSS
Stack Overflow Trends
Community Questions for Confluence
Stack Roboflow
Smarty Bot
Answer Bot by Intercom
Stack Overflow for Teams
Google Trends Visualizer
Glimpse
960 Grid System Stack Overflow TrendsBased on our record, Stack Overflow Trends seems to be a lot more popular than 960 Grid System. While we know about 28 links to Stack Overflow Trends, we've tracked only 2 mentions of 960 Grid System. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Back in the day, web designers were hand-writing CSS, which, trust me, was a journey full of twists (for more on this, see CSS The Good Parts). Then the 2000s hit, bringing with them CSS frameworks like Blueprint, 960 Grid System, YUI Grids, and YAML (probably not the YAML you’re thinking of). These frameworks introduced responsive grids and clean UI elements, changing the game. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
However I just got a new job in the past year and wow I realized my knowledge is way behind. Like, as far behind as somebody in the IE9 days would've been who was stuck doing table-based design. Like, as far behind as somebody in 2013 would've been if they were still stuck using 960.gs for their layouts. Source: over 1 year ago
It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Community Questions for Confluence - Keep questions and answers in one place with an engaging, community-driven Q&A discussion forum, powered by Confluence
Unsemantic CSS Framework - Unsemantic is a fluid grid system that is the successor to the 960 Grid System.
Stack Roboflow - Coding questions pondered by an AI.
Bulma - Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.
Smarty Bot - Wiki for tech teams, right where work happens