Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AirBrake VS TrackJS

Compare AirBrake VS TrackJS and see what are their differences

AirBrake logo AirBrake

Airbrake is the leading exception reporting service, currently providing error tracking.

TrackJS logo TrackJS

JavaScript Error Tracking for Modern Web Applications
  • AirBrake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-17
  • TrackJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-27

AirBrake features and specs

  • Error Monitoring
    AirBrake provides comprehensive error monitoring for web applications, helping developers quickly identify and fix bugs. It automatically captures exceptions and provides detailed reports, improving the debugging process.
  • Integration
    AirBrake supports integration with various development tools such as GitHub, Jira, Slack, and more. This allows for seamless workflow management and collaboration between team members.
  • Real-Time Notifications
    AirBrake offers real-time notifications for errors via email, Slack, or other communication tools, ensuring that developers are immediately informed of any issues, thus minimizing downtime and improving responsiveness.
  • Detailed Reports
    AirBrake provides detailed error reports, including stack traces, environment information, and user context. This in-depth data aids in swiftly understanding the root cause of issues.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform has an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for developers of all expertise levels to navigate and utilize effectively.

Possible disadvantages of AirBrake

  • Cost
    AirBrake can be expensive, especially for small teams or startups. The cost may add up quickly as the number of applications or error occurrences increases.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan is quite limited in its features and capabilities, which can restrict its usability for developers who do not opt for a paid plan.
  • Customization
    Some users may find the customization options to be lacking compared to other error monitoring tools, limiting their ability to tailor alerts and reports to specific needs.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there can be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all the features and integrations AirBrake offers.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, integrating AirBrake may introduce a slight performance overhead to the monitored applications, which could be a concern for performance-critical environments.

TrackJS features and specs

  • Real-time Error Tracking
    TrackJS provides real-time monitoring and alerting of JavaScript errors, allowing developers to quickly identify and address issues as they occur in live environments.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    The service offers comprehensive error reports with detailed stack traces and metadata, helping developers understand the context of errors for more efficient debugging.
  • User-friendly Interface
    TrackJS features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate dashboard, making it accessible even for developers who may not be familiar with error tracking tools.
  • Integrations
    The platform supports various integrations with popular development tools and services such as Slack, GitHub, and Jira, enabling seamless workflow enhancements.
  • Performance Impact
    TrackJS is designed to have minimal performance impact on your application, ensuring that error tracking does not degrade user experience.

Possible disadvantages of TrackJS

  • Pricing
    TrackJS may be considered expensive for smaller teams or projects, as the cost can add up depending on the level of service required.
  • Customization
    While TrackJS provides a robust set of features out-of-the-box, it may lack the level of customization or flexibility needed for specific use cases or complex applications.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier of TrackJS may have limitations in terms of features and data usage, which could be restrictive for some users looking for a more comprehensive solution.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Using TrackJS introduces a dependency on an external service for error tracking, which could be a concern for organizations with strict data policies or those preferring self-hosted solutions.

AirBrake videos

No AirBrake videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

TrackJS videos

Redux TrackJS Logger

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AirBrake and TrackJS)
Error Tracking
75 75%
25% 25
Exception Monitoring
72 72%
28% 28
Crash Reporting
69 69%
31% 31
Monitoring Tools
51 51%
49% 49

User comments

Share your experience with using AirBrake and TrackJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AirBrake and TrackJS

AirBrake Reviews

6 Bugsnag Alternatives to Consider in 2021
Airbrake can discover and report exceptions and other code issues automatically. Using Airbrake, you can quickly organize errors and events into various categories. This error grouping feature is one of the most in-demand features among error management tools and is unique to Airbrake. You can choose and design your list of categories and instruct Airbrake to classify...
Source: scoutapm.com

TrackJS Reviews

We have no reviews of TrackJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AirBrake should be more popular than TrackJS. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AirBrake mentions (2)

  • How to Setup a Project That Can Host Up to 1000 Users for Free
    The Rollbar’s ancestor, Airbrake, is another good choice (if you can afford it, because it has no free plan). You can see a detailed comparison between these two here: https://rollbar.com/vs/airbrake/. The same applies to Honeybadger — one more popular modern error management service for rails. In a nutshell, they do similar things but may have different bells and whistles. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Airbrake.io in apps
    How is the functionality of airbrake.io in apps? Looking to switch from crashlytics. Source: almost 4 years ago

TrackJS mentions (1)

  • First 6 months with eBay/Adevinta
    Holding a hand on a pulse of metrics for errors;. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AirBrake and TrackJS, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

BugSnag - Not all bugs are worth fixing. Prioritize and fix software bugs that matter while improving software stability with every release.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

Raygun - Raygun gives developers meaningful insights into problems affecting their applications. Discover issues - Understand the problem - Fix things faster.

Instabug - The top apps in the world rely on Instabug for beta testing, user engagement and crash reporting.

GlitchTip - GlitchTip is an open source, Sentry API compatible error tracking platform.