Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
EST

ANTLR VS ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio

Compare ANTLR VS ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

ANTLR logo ANTLR

ANTLR, ANother Tool for Language Recognition, is a language tool that provides a framework for...

ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio logo ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio

Tunnel Grammar Studio is an Integrated Development Environment for generating parsers (also known as parser generator or a compiler compiler).
  • ANTLR Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-28
  • ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18

ANTLR features and specs

  • Human-Readable Grammar
    ANTLR uses a grammar language that is intuitive and easy to read, which makes it accessible for developers to write and understand language specifications.
  • Comprehensive Tooling
    ANTLR comes with a full suite of tools for grammar development, testing, and analysis, which aids in the rapid development of parsers.
  • Target Language Support
    ANTLR can generate code for multiple target languages, including Java, C#, Python, and JavaScript, providing flexibility in implementation across various platforms.
  • Error Handling
    ANTLR provides built-in support for robust error detection and recovery, helping developers to handle syntax errors gracefully.
  • Active Community and Support
    Being popular and widely-used, ANTLR has a large community, offering abundant resources, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of ANTLR

  • Steep Learning Curve
    ANTLR requires understanding concepts of lexing and parsing which can be challenging for beginners unfamiliar with language processing.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstracted complexity in ANTLR might introduce some performance overhead, especially for large grammars or resource-constrained environments.
  • Limited Integration
    Integration with certain development environments can be limited, requiring more effort for setup and configuration.
  • Complex Error Messages
    ANTLR's error messages can sometimes be cryptic or hard to understand, making debugging more difficult for developers.
  • Version Compatibility
    Different versions of ANTLR might have compatibility issues, necessitating careful attention to version-specific features and documentation.

ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

ANTLR videos

+ Add

ANTLR v4 with Terence Parr

More videos:

  • Review - Create a Text Parser in C# with ANTLR
  • Review - Antlr v4 on Java IntelliJ

ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio videos

No ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ANTLR and ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio)

ANTLR

ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio

Developer Tools
73 73%
Developer Tools
27% 27
Parser Generator
69 69%
Parser Generator
31% 31
Monitoring Tools
73 73%
Monitoring Tools
27% 27
Feature Flags
100 100%
Feature Flags
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using ANTLR and ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ANTLR seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ANTLR mentions (2)

  • Bored CS student in my junior year. Give me something to do! (free plugins)
    I already posted here about a project, but I could also use help on Mantle. It's a new command framework powered by ANTLR, if that's something you're interested in. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Open Source SQL Parsers
    An alternate approach is to implement the SQL grammar using parser generators like ANTLR. There Are similar open source parser generators in other popular languages. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio yet. Tracking of ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ANTLR and ExperaSoft Tunnel Grammar Studio, you can also consider the following products

Bison - GNU Bison, commonly known as Bison, is a parser generator that is part of the GNU Project.

textX - textX is a meta-language for building Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) in Python. It is inspired by Xtext. It will help you build your textual language easily. You can invent your own language or build a support for an existing textual language.

Ragel - Ragel compiles executable finite state machines from regular languages.

Eclipse Xtext - The website of Eclipse Xtext, an open-source framework for development of programming languages and domain-specific languages

LiveAgent - LiveAgent is a fully-featured web-based live chat and help desk software. It harnesses the power of a universal inbox, real-time live chat, built-in call center, and a robust customer service portal. Start your free 1 month trial today!

dropincc.java - dropincc.java - A small and easy to use parser generator.

Loading...