Based on our record, BundlePhobia should be more popular than Apple Machine Learning Journal. It has been mentiond 51 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
For your reference, Apple's pages for Machine Learning for Developers and for their research. The Apple Neural Engine was custom designed to work better with their proprietary machine learning programs -- and they've been opening up access to developers by extending support / compatibility for TensorFlow and PyTorch. They've also got CoreML, CreateML, and various APIs they are making to allow more use of their... Source: about 1 year ago
We even host annual poster sessions of those PhD intern’s work while at our company, and it’ll give you an idea of the caliber of work. It may not be as great as Nvidia, Stryker, Waymo, or Tesla (which are not part of MAANG but I believe are far more ahead in CV), but it’s worth of considering. Source: about 1 year ago
They have something for ML: https://machinelearning.apple.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
They're more subtle about it, I think. https://machinelearning.apple.com/ Some of the papers are pretty good. I don't disagree with your sentiment in aggregate, though. Source: about 2 years ago
Siri is not where it needs to be because Apple refuses to mine user data to enrich it. They also are very hesitant to allow researchers to publish their breakthroughs which makes recruitment very hard. Although this is changing https://machinelearning.apple.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
There are some handy tools for identifying and addressing problematic bundles. One of them, Bundlephobia, gives insights into how much an NPM package contributes to bundle size, helping avoid too large collections of files. Import Cost, a VSCode Extension, calculates the 'cost' of imported packages, helping to make informed decisions. As part of our optimization strategy, we've swapped out hefty JS libraries, such... - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
So, before adding a dependency to your projects, ask yourself if you truly need it and check how much a package weighs. If you would like to go through cleaning up process, I wrote an article on optimizing Next.js bundle size on my private blog. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
🔴 https://bundlephobia.com/ - estimate a footprint, basically how many Kb will be added to your bundle when you add this dependency to your project. Those may differ a lot, try comparing say - dayjs vs momentjs ;. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
I have phobia of dependencies and package sizes, so tiptap is 62KB and remirror is 150KB. Not much difference, since difference is no in MB's. Source: 10 months ago
External packages increase your app bundle size (you can calculate this using BundlePhobia), so adding a third-party package for every development requirement isn’t always a good choice. Also, third-party packages may not completely fulfill your design requirements and may bring features that you don’t even use. Writing your own stepper component is also an option by including only the required features. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Amazon Machine Learning - Machine learning made easy for developers of any skill level
bundlejs - A quick and easy way to bundle, minify, and compress (gzip and brotli) your ts, js, jsx and npm projects all online, with the bundle file size.
Machine Learning Playground - Breathtaking visuals for learning ML techniques.
JavaScript.com - A free resource for learning and developing in JavaScript
Lobe - Visual tool for building custom deep learning models
The State of JavaScript 2018 - Discover the latest trends in the JavaScript ecosystem