While Asana is a robust task management and project planning tool, in my experience, it falls slightly short when compared to Trello, particularly in terms of user-friendliness and simplicity. Asana offers a variety of features such as multiple project views (list, board, timeline, calendar), custom fields, and reporting tools, which can be highly beneficial for complex project management. However, I found that the learning curve can be steep, especially for team members not familiar with this type of software. The interface, while feature-rich, can feel a bit cluttered and overwhelming for new users. On the other hand, Trello shines in its simplicity and straightforward design. The visual card and board system is intuitive and easy to grasp, making it a more accessible tool for team members of varying tech proficiency levels. Additionally, Trello's user interface is cleaner and more streamlined, which contributes to an overall more enjoyable user experience.
In terms of collaboration, both tools provide good collaborative features like commenting, tagging, and task assignment. However, I appreciate Trello's flexibility with its Power-Ups, allowing integration with a wide array of apps which enhances its functionality. In conclusion, while Asana is a powerful tool with extensive features, I prefer Trello for its ease of use, simplicity, and intuitive design. However, I do see the value of Asana for larger teams or more complex projects.
Asana is a popular project management tool that has a lot to offer. It is fast and versatile, making it easy for individuals and teams to collaborate and get things done. The interface is clean and user-friendly, and there are plenty of features to help you organise and track your projects.
However, while Asana is a good tool, it is not the best on the market. One of its main weaknesses is its lack of advanced reporting and analysis capabilities. It can be challenging to get a comprehensive view of your projects and how they are progressing, especially if you have a large number of them.
Another issue is the cost. Asana can be expensive for teams with a lot of members, especially when compared to other project management tools that offer similar features at a lower price point.
Asana is a very representative app for the work environment I'm a part of with team members and users it's stellar for: β’ To manage it on the web and portable devices β’ With option and manageability on the web β’ To set up projects and invite team members. β’ The projects have a roadmap to know the displacement of each activity. β’ Tasks can contain subtasks to keep track of work β’ Allows granting tasks, define expiration periods. β’ Effective and useful for adding files, making comments, and tags.
Based on our record, Asana seems to be a lot more popular than Satis. While we know about 87 links to Asana, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Satis. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To keep our projects organized and on track, we use project management tools such as Trello or Asana. These tools help us visualize workflow stages, assign tasks, set deadlines, and update statuses in real time. They are critical in maintaining transparency and accountability within the software development team, providing a clear overview of project progress at any given time. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
Asana.com β Free for private project with collaborators. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Asana: Another project management tool that provides task assignment and progress tracking features. [Official Website]. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
You could check out Asana, Monday, ClickUp and GoodDay for example (I use the latter). Source: 8 months ago
For most teams who don't have the option to subscribe to popular Project Management apps like JIRA, Asana, ClickUp, or Monday, you can make use of GitHub's issue management system to track the bugs in your application. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Note: Satis is a local repo repository β the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: almost 2 years ago
If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: almost 2 years ago
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 2 years ago
My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: almost 2 years ago
Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: over 2 years ago
Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.
Private Packagist - Composer package archive as a service for PHP
Wrike - Wrike is a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use collaborative work management software that helps high-performance teams organize and accomplish their work. Try it now.
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.
Artifactory - The worldβs most advanced repository manager.