Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Automox VS Kenna

Compare Automox VS Kenna and see what are their differences

Automox logo Automox

Patch any System, any Software, in Any Location with Automox. Our cloud-based, automated cyber hygiene & patching management software was built for today's IT professionals.

Kenna logo Kenna

Kenna is a risk intelligence & vulnerability platform that enables InfoSec teams to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities faster.
  • Automox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • Kenna Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

Automox features and specs

  • Cloud-Native Platform
    Automox utilizes a cloud-based architecture, which allows for seamless remote management of patches and updates without the need for on-premises infrastructure.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and various Linux distributions, enabling versatile management in diverse IT environments.
  • Automated Patching
    Provides automated patching capabilities which reduce manual workload and ensure systems stay up-to-date with minimal human intervention.
  • Real-Time Dashboards
    Offers real-time visibility into the status of patches and compliance through interactive dashboards, helping IT teams make informed decisions quickly.
  • Custom Policies
    Allows the creation of custom patching policies to align with specific organizational needs and compliance requirements.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed with an intuitive user interface that simplifies the process of patch management even for users who may not be highly technical.

Possible disadvantages of Automox

  • Cost
    The pricing model can be costly for larger organizations as Automox charges per endpoint, which can add up quickly.
  • Feature Limitations
    Certain features and advanced functionalities may be limited or require higher-tier subscriptions, potentially restricting smaller businesses.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there can be an initial learning curve for administrators who are accustomed to different patch management solutions.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-native solution, continuous internet connectivity is required, which could be a downside for organizations with unreliable internet service.
  • Limited Integration
    May not integrate seamlessly with all existing IT systems or third-party applications, potentially requiring additional configuration or custom solutions.

Kenna features and specs

  • Risk-Based Approach
    Kenna Security focuses on a risk-based approach to vulnerability management, allowing organizations to prioritize vulnerabilities based on their potential impact and exploitability, which enhances the efficiency of the remediation process.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Kenna offers robust integration with various security and IT tools, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows and improve overall security posture through consolidated data and insights.
  • Data-Driven Insights
    The platform leverages data science and machine learning to analyze vast amounts of data, providing actionable insights and recommendations for addressing vulnerabilities in a more informed manner.
  • Scalability
    Kenna is designed to scale with the needs of organizations of different sizes, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises with extensive IT environments.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform features an intuitive user interface that simplifies vulnerability management tasks, making it easier for security professionals to navigate and effectively use the tool.

Possible disadvantages of Kenna

  • Cost
    Kenna Security can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations with limited budgets, potentially making it less accessible for some potential users.
  • Complexity of Implementation
    Implementing Kenna can be complex and time-consuming, requiring thorough planning and execution to integrate seamlessly with existing systems and processes.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of functionality in Kenna may still present a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with risk-based vulnerability management concepts.
  • Dependency on Data Quality
    Kenna's effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality and accuracy of the data it analyzes. Poor data quality can lead to less effective vulnerability prioritization and remediation strategies.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users may find that the platform offers limited customization options, which can hinder its adaptability to specific organizational needs and preferences.

Automox videos

Get Started with Automox

More videos:

  • Review - Webinar: Automating Patching & Configuration Management with Automox
  • Review - What Does Automox Do?

Kenna videos

My thoughts on kenna/CozyKitsune//(My first digital art and review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Automox and Kenna)
Monitoring Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Security & Privacy
31 31%
69% 69
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Patch Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Automox and Kenna. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kenna seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Automox mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Automox yet. Tracking of Automox recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Kenna mentions (1)

  • CISO Series Video Chat vs. Webinar
    In this video, I chat with Ed Bellis (@ebellis), co-founder and CTO for Kenna Security, about the frustration of doing webinars. Ed and his company have been a repeat guest and sponsor with the CISO Series. We discussed what makes the video chats a lot more fun and engaging than doing a webinar. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Automox and Kenna, you can also consider the following products

ITarian - IT and remote access management solution

SolarWinds Patch Manager - SolarWinds Patch Manager is an intuitive patch management software for quickly addressing software vulnerabilities.

SnaPatch - Software to manage your Azure, SCCM and VMware or HyperV environments, designed with the Administrator in mind. Let's make Administration easy.

Kandji - Kandji is the Apple device management and security platform that empowers secure and productive global work.

SolarWinds RMM - SolarWinds RMM is a remote IT management tool that allows users to handle all kinds of related tasks through a single dashboard.

Avast Business Patch Management - Avast Business Patch Management is a platform that allows users to attach an extra layer of security in the endpoint foundation, and they can improve the overall protection of their cyber system.