BlueGriffon VS Sitecake

BlueGriffon

An HTML editor based on Mozilla rendering engine.

Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.

Landing page //
2021-10-15

Landing page //
2022-09-11

BlueGriffon

Website: bluegriffon.org

Edit details

BlueGriffon videos

+ Add

How To Edit an HTML Web Page Using BlueGriffon - PLR Tutorial

Sitecake videos

+ Add

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BlueGriffon and Sitecake)

Sitecake

Text Editors

100 100%

Text Editors

0% 0

CMS

28 28%

CMS

72% 72

Website Design

100 100%

Website Design

0% 0

Blogging Platform

0 0%

Blogging Platform

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using BlueGriffon and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BlueGriffon and Sitecake

BlueGriffon Reviews

Top 8 Dreamweaver Alternatives for Web Designers

BlueGriffon is one of the effective web editors, which also has the power of open-source community and rendering engine of Mozilla. First, BlueGriffon includes an ultra-simple UI that can attract most of web developers in very first look itself. The open-source tool, coming with the support for Windows, Mac and Linux, can help you in building the web for tomorrow. The tool...

Source: xtendedview.com

Top 10 Best Adobe Dreamweaver Alternatives for Web Design

BlueGriffon looks and feels a lot like Kompozer which is probably why I like it a lot. The free version does not include an FTP upload facility which is a bit disappointing. If you want to get more serious about your web design then the paid versions are worth a look too.

Source: www.technize.com

7 open source alternatives to Dreamweaver

BlueGriffon is an open source WYSIWYG editor powered by Gecko, the rendering engine developed for Mozilla Firefox. One of a few derivatives of NVU, a now-discontinued HTML editor, BlueGriffon is the only actively developed NVU derivative that supports HTML5 as well as modern components of CSS. If your goal is to write as little actual HTML as possible, then BlueGriffon is...

Source: opensource.com

Sitecake Reviews

We have no reviews of Sitecake yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Sitecake might be a bit more popular than BlueGriffon. We know about 5 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to BlueGriffon. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BlueGriffon mentions (5)

Controlling Websites from apps?
There have been and still are lots of apps that do this very thing from various angles. Unfortunately, my favourite apps are no longer supported. They were: Dreamweaver; and PHPed. I would suggest checking out BlueGriffon for example. Source: about 1 year ago
Submitting content to my online website feels a little…primitive
Another option would be a WYSIWYG HTML editor that also gives you access to the HTML code, such as BlueGriffon. Source: over 1 year ago
I am just flabbergasted and in complete stupor (point me to an MS FrontPage alternative)
You can try the free version of BlueGriffon. It has WYSIWYG authoring. http://bluegriffon.org/. Source: over 1 year ago
Mozilla’s Vision for the Evolution of the Web
» https://github.com/JustOff/ca-archive For me, before Firefox 57, it worked superbly for me. Afterwards, of my 13 essential addons, only 2 still worked and one of those was trivial and unimportant. It destroyed my browser and drove me away from using Firefox after nearly 20 years, dozens of computers and ½ dozen different operating systems. Other cut functionality: The best cross-platform FOSS email client, by... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
What is the best FREE easy website creator?
Traditionally the best tool for easy web pages is Adobe Dreamweaver but as you want free: Http://bluegriffon.org/. Source: about 3 years ago

Sitecake mentions (5)

Maintaining this site fucking sucks
Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago