Based on our record, Artifactory should be more popular than Brandfolder. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Two of them are brandfolder.com and https://www.frontify.com/en/ are two of the platforms that have placed themselves as a place to manage full branding content. Also, I believe that Canva is not too far behind with its interface. Their coining this as Digital Asset Management. Source: about 1 year ago
Here’s a good example. Brandfolder’s primary brand color is a turquoise blue but their website uses purple and dark blue in varying shades. https://brandfolder.com/. Source: over 1 year ago
Market Leader Https://brandfolder.com/ ("best", expensive, custom quotes as it locks-in enterprise clients) example of use: https://brandfolder.com/riboliwines/riboliestatesgroup. Source: over 1 year ago
I kind of hate it, but Artifactory seems popular at companies: https://jfrog.com/artifactory/. Source: 12 months ago
When not providing all dependencies yourself, you might suffer from people deleting the packages you depend on (IMHO a very rare scenario). If it is really that critical (hint: usually it isn't), create a local mirror of Pypi (full or only the packages you need). Devpi, Artifactory, etc. Can do that or you just dump the necessary files into Cloud storage, so you have a backup. Source: about 1 year ago
Operate a pull-through cache registry, like Artifactory or the open source reference Docker registry. This will allow you to pull images from Docker Hub less frequently, improving your chances of staying under the anonymous usage limit. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Like suppose for a second that . . . Idk . . . a product team wants our ci workflows to start using Artifactory. Okay great, I don't know Artifactory integration but I'm going to tell them "Sure, I'll get right on that.". Source: over 1 year ago
If these "assets" have an independent release schedule I would treat them separately (especially if they are externally provided). If they are not built from source then treat them as artefacts, they don't belong in git. You can store the in an artefact repository (like Artifactory of Nexus) or (as u/nekokattt points out) in something like S3. Source: over 1 year ago
Bynder - Bynder is a cloud-based digital asset management solution for marketing professionals looking to simplify how they manage digital content via one central portal.
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
Venngage - Join over 1 million people creating their own professional graphics with our easy to use infographic maker. Sign up for free and choose from 1000+ infographic templates.
Cloudsmith - Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.
Pics.io - Pics.io is a cloud service that people can use to manage their creative content and files, collaborate with their peers on this content, and then share it with their clients. Read more about Pics.io.
Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.