Brave Search Reviews

1. Notgiv Inmaname

   | Random guy at Hypothetical Inexistent Organization of Proffesional Dumbasses | over 2 years ago
   Brave Search is way better than other search engines.

   In contrast to other "private" search engines (except for Presearch and SearX), it doesn't have trackers, or not nearly as many. This information can be verified by installing uBlock Origin and ClearURLs, which detect 0 and 2 trackers respectively, against for example DuckDuckGo's nearly 10 and 19. Other alternatives are SearX (No trackers AT ALL, still kinda user-friendly) and Presearch (A bit easier to use but a tiny bit worse for privacy, it has 1 more tracking element).

   🏁 Competitors: DuckDuckGo, Mojeek, StartPage, Presearch, Searx, Google, Bing, Yahoo, Ecosia, Ask.com, Qwant

   👍 Pros:    Good search results|Not too many trackers|Not buggy|Easy to use

   👎 Cons:    Has 2 tracking url elements

JSONFormatter.org Reviews

1. ip

   7 months ago
   It's my go to tool for JSON

   JSONFormatter.org is an invaluable tool for anyone working with JSON data. Its simple and user-friendly interface makes formatting, validating, and analyzing JSON effortless. The website's clean design allows for easy navigation and top-notch functionality.

   🏁 Competitors: CodeBeautify

Brave Search mentions (334)

• Microsoft outage affects Bing, Copilot, DuckDuckGo and ChatGPT internet search

  I was talking about Brave Search (https://search.brave.com), not Brave browser. Seaech doesn't promote crypto. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Microsoft outage affects Bing, Copilot, DuckDuckGo and ChatGPT internet search

  Brave rolled their own completely independent search [1] on what I assume is a relatively limited budget. It seems that regularly grabbing the data would be pretty easy. The harder part would be searching/ordering it in an efficient and meaningful way while avoiding SEO, but that seems more like a fun problem than a difficult one (if not both). [1] - https://search.brave.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Microsoft outage affects Bing, Copilot, DuckDuckGo and ChatGPT internet search

  Brave Search [1] is 100% independent. There's also Yandex [2] which also works excellently, but is biased towards more Russian language results. The image search is second to none though. [1] - https://search.brave.com/ [2] - https://yandex.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Microsoft outage affects Bing, Copilot, DuckDuckGo and ChatGPT internet search

  Nice to see https://search.brave.com/, https://entireweb.com and https://mojeek.com are still kicking it. In case anyone needs to know alternatives besides the monopoly that is Google. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• What Happened to DuckDuckGo?

  Https://search.brave.com/ using that as my default search engine on firefox since last year. Quite happy with the quality of results. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

JSONFormatter.org mentions (24)

• Blasphemous - Stuck at 148.25% - SOLUTION

  Now with your savefile decrypted click the "copy" button on the "output" tab (to the right of the trash can) and proceed to this website: https://jsonformatter.org/ Here you'll make the code more readable so paste what you've copied on the left box and click on the button on the middle that says "Format/Beautify". Then go to the box on the right where the code should be nice and pretty now and (once again) copy... Source: 9 months ago

• Selfhosted Prettyprint/Encoder/Decoder/Validator/Utility thing?

  I find myself using various online converters - prettyprint, URLencode/decode, HTML entity converter JSON validator, etc. I could whip these out in a CLI tool, but pasting to a web page is faster (for one thing, no need to remember all the various command semantics, deal with escaping, argument length limitations, etc). Something like https://jsonformatter.org. However, I don't like the idea of putting my data out... Source: about 1 year ago

• mediaconvert for audio - settings check please "The request could not be interpreted."

  If that's literally what you're passing in, it isn't remotely valid JSON. It should look like one of the examples here, and pass through any JSON validator. Source: about 1 year ago

• Comparison of realistic models

  The best way to view the statistic is just to copy the json in some json formatter, like this one here: https://jsonformatter.org. Source: about 1 year ago

• Retrieving value from JSON data in Python

  Paste that into this site: https://jsonformatter.org/ (on the left side) then validate and beautify. If you then change the view on the right to "tree", you will see that you need to drill down into your object/data through "growth", "maximum_temperature" and "deg_c" to get the Celsius temperature. This should give you a very good clue to what you need to do. Source: about 1 year ago