Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserCat VS Codacy

Compare BrowserCat VS Codacy and see what are their differences

BrowserCat logo BrowserCat

Easy, fast, and reliable browser automation and headless browser APIs. The web is messy, but your code shouldn't be.

Codacy logo Codacy

Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
  • BrowserCat Home Page
    Home Page //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Metrics Dashboard
    Metrics Dashboard //
    2023-12-21
  • BrowserCat Easy Setup
    Easy Setup //
    2023-12-21

Finally, you can develop browser automation without the pain and the cost of deploying a fleet of headless browsers. Connect to BrowserCat, scale globally, and pay only for what you use. Scrape the web, automate your workflows, test your apps, generate beautiful images and pdfs from HTML, give you AI agent web access, and more.

Get started in minutes. Our forever-free plan gives you 1,000 free requests per month.

  • Codacy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis without the hassle.

BrowserCat

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Web REST API Google Chrome Firefox Safari
Release Date
-

Codacy

Website
codacy.com
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
2012 January
Startup details
Country
Portugal
State
Lisboa
City
Lisbon
Founder(s)
Jaime Jorge
Employees
1 - 9

BrowserCat videos

No BrowserCat videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codacy videos

Using Codacy for automated code reviews

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserCat and Codacy)
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Web Crawling
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing BrowserCat and Codacy.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built on robust open source technology that's under active development. The star of the show is Playwright, which is our recommended automation library. It's maintained by Microsoft, it officially supports JS, Python, Java, and .NET, and it's fast becoming the industry standard. BrowserCat also supports Puppeteer and numerous unofficial Playwright ports to Go, Rust, PHP, and Ruby.

What makes your product unique?

BrowserCat's answer

Unlike other headless browser providers, BrowserCat gives you total control over your browser instances for as long as you need them. Leverage the browsers cache, cookies, and storage for bespoke browser automation jobs that truly differentiate your business from the competition.

What's the story behind your product?

BrowserCat's answer

In previous corporate and startup gigs, I faced the challenge of developing robust, fast, and scalable browser automation. Most APIs in the space are too limiting for our needs and they were often incredibly slow. On the other hand, hosting your own headless browser fleet was a pain. I founded BrowserCat to make scaling up browser automation as easy, reliable, and affordable as deploying a serverless function.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BrowserCat's answer

We primarily serve developers, whether the seek to develop unique browser automation jobs or radically improve the performance of their integration tests. However, we frequently work with management, biz ops, and product leaders to solve problems they can't solve any way but through automation.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BrowserCat's answer

BrowserCat is built for performance, scalability, stability, and affordability using modern web technologies. Many of our competitors were early to market and compete on entrenchment rather than functionality. Still others are bound by their existing users to continue supporting legacy tech, rather than embrace improved, modern standards. BrowserCat is focused on supporting your for the next ten years, rather than the past ten years.

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserCat and Codacy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserCat and Codacy

BrowserCat Reviews

We have no reviews of BrowserCat yet.
Be the first one to post

Codacy Reviews

Ten Best SonarQube alternatives in 2021
Codacy automates code opinions and monitors code quality on each sprint. The main issues it covers concern code style, best practices, and security. In addition, it monitors adjustments in code insurance, code duplication, and code complexity. She was saving developers time in code opinions, consequently successfully tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala,...
Source: duecode.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Codacy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserCat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BrowserCat yet. Tracking of BrowserCat recommendations started around Dec 2023.

Codacy mentions (4)

  • What is the best way to set a cookie (without setcookie?)
    I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Converting vstest coverage files in github actions?
    Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • PHP Static Analysis Tools Review
    Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • Top 10 ways to perform fast code reviews
    Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserCat and Codacy, you can also consider the following products

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

CodeFactor.io - Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket