Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Browserless VS Crusher.dev

Compare Browserless VS Crusher.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Browserless logo Browserless

Headless browser automation built for developers.

Crusher.dev logo Crusher.dev

Crusher | No-code e2e testing that allows you create and run test in <5 mins. Better alternative to selenium, cypress, browserstack, lambdatest, puepetter for testing.
  • Browserless Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
Not present

Crusher is open-source no-code e2e web testing/monitoring. E2E testing is grueling and frustrating. We're reimagining the whole workflow to make it blazingly simple and fast.

We're no-code alternative to selenium, cypress, browserstack, lambdatest, puepetter for UI/User flow for cross browser testing .

🔮 Features

  • Create test without no code/low code.
  • Test UI and compare pixel perfect change with the last build.
  • Replay tests recording to debug faster.
  • Run test on chromium (Open source) and all browsers supported (EE).
  • Primitive user actions detection.
  • Production monitoring (EE feature)
  • Integrate with Github/Other services as Build check (EE feature)
  • Get alerts when build fails.
  • Report accessible by everyone in the team.

Crusher.dev

$ Details
freemium $50.0 / Monthly (5 testing hours)
Platforms
Web Browser Mac OSX Windows Linux
Release Date
2022 January

Browserless features and specs

  • Scalability
    Browserless allows for scalable execution of browser automation scripts. It can handle multiple browser instances concurrently, which is beneficial for businesses needing to run numerous automated tasks in parallel.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform provides an API that simplifies the process of integrating browser automation into existing workflows. It's designed to be user-friendly even for those with limited experience in browser automation.
  • Reduced Infrastructure Overhead
    By using Browserless, businesses can offload the infrastructure burden of maintaining browser automation environments, reducing costs associated with hardware and maintenance.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Browserless offers extensive documentation, making it easier for users to understand and utilize the platform efficiently, facilitating quicker onboarding and troubleshooting.
  • Security
    The platform includes security features such as encrypted connections and isolation of browser instances, providing a secure environment for executing tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Browserless

  • Cost
    While reducing infrastructure costs, Browserless introduces a subscription cost. For some small businesses or individual users, this cost might be prohibitive compared to running automation tasks on local machines.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service means any downtime or service issues with Browserless can directly impact your automation processes.
  • Limited Control
    Users might have limited control over specific browser settings and configurations as opposed to managing their own browser instances.
  • Learning Curve for APIs
    While the API is designed to be user-friendly, there is still a learning curve associated with understanding and effectively implementing it within one’s existing systems.
  • Potential Latency
    Since Browserless runs in the cloud, there may be latency issues depending on the user's network connection and proximity to the nearest service data center.

Crusher.dev features and specs

  • Testing management
  • GitHub, Bitbucket and GitLab Integrations
  • Slack integration
  • No Coding Skills Required
  • API
  • Open-source

Browserless videos

What is browserless?

Crusher.dev videos

Crusher- demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Browserless and Crusher.dev)
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Browserless and Crusher.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Browserless should be more popular than Crusher.dev. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Browserless mentions (8)

  • Self-hosted, simple web browser service – send URL, get screenshots
    If you’re worried about the security risks, edge cases, maintenance pain and scaling challenges of self hosting there are various solid hosted alternatives: - https://browserless.io - low level browser control - https://scrapingbee.com - scraping specialists - https://urlbox.com - screenshot specialists* They’re all profitable and have been around for years so you can depend on the businesses and the tech. *... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Web Crawler and Scraper for AI
    Very cool - and impressive speed! How does it compare with headless browser services like https://browserless.io or https://browserbase.com ? - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: Finic – open-source platform for building browser automations
    Https://browserless.io might be what you’re looking for. Open source although they do have a SaaS option. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • browserless Alternatives?
    Hello, I am building a scraper and I want to know if anyone knows an alternative to browserless.io? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • (Free) Open-source PDF Generation/Export
    Otherwise, any pdf to hml chromium based solution hosted via docker, like gotenberg](https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg) or browserless.io(which is free if you create open source). Generating pdfs from html directly in .NET was always a pain. Wkhtml (and wrappers that use it) uses WebKit and comes with a load of issues of its own, similar to running and styling anything in Safari. Using chromium based engine... Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Crusher.dev mentions (2)

  • Crusher - All in on testing
    Install with just one command npx crusher.dev. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Do you have a dedicated QA team?
    Problem I faced in past with a dedicated QA team is, the development process is often faster than QA. Which puts QA in the backseat with each new release. Also, human coordination becomes a problem as there will be a small configuration of which QAs team might not be aware of e.g. A/B configurations, hotfixes, etc. On the other hand, with devs writing tests is there is learning curve and most devs have not written... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Browserless and Crusher.dev, you can also consider the following products

Rebrowser - Discover Rebrowser - the next-gen virtual browser that outperform headless and antidetect solutions. Enjoy real device fingerprints, mobile support, and AI-powered CAPTCHA solving for seamless browsing.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.