Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
WI

Browsershots VS Web to Image

Compare Browsershots VS Web to Image and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Browsershots logo Browsershots

Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.

Web to Image logo Web to Image

API for taking screenshot of a webpage from URL or HTML
  • Browsershots Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15
  • Web to Image Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-10

Browsershots features and specs

  • Wide Browser Coverage
    Browsershots supports a large variety of browsers across different operating systems, making it easier for developers to see how their website looks in multiple scenarios.
  • Free to Use
    The service offers a free version which allows users to test their websites in numerous browsers without any cost.
  • Screenshot Capability
    It provides screenshots of how websites are rendered in different browsers, enabling developers to quickly identify rendering issues.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, Browsershots doesn't require any software installation, making it easily accessible from any machine with an internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of Browsershots

  • Limited Interactivity
    Being a screenshot service, it doesn't support interactive testing, such as click events or navigation within the website.
  • Queue Times
    During peak times, there can be significant delays in getting screenshots due to the queuing system, especially for free users.
  • Outdated Browsers
    Some of the browsers offered for testing are outdated, which may not be useful for modern web development needs.
  • No Real-time Testing
    The service does not offer real-time testing capabilities, which means developers cannot debug issues immediately as they would in a local development environment.

Web to Image features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    The platform offers a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly convert web pages into images without the need for complex setups or technical expertise.
  • High-Quality Output
    Web to Image generates high-quality images that maintain the integrity and resolution of the original web page, ensuring that visuals are crisp and clear.
  • Supports Multiple Formats
    Users can export images in various formats such as PNG, JPEG, or PDF, providing flexibility depending on their needs.
  • Automation Capabilities
    The service can be integrated into automated workflows to regularly capture web page states, which is useful for monitoring or archival purposes.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, there is no need for software installation or hardware dependencies, making it accessible from any device with an internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of Web to Image

  • Limited Customization
    The tool may not offer extensive customization options for the dimensions, layout, or aspect ratio of the output image, which can be a limitation for professional users.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    Since it is a web-based service, users need a stable internet connection to access its features and process images, potentially limiting use in offline scenarios.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Uploading web page data to an online service raises potential privacy issues, especially with sensitive or confidential information.
  • Subscription Costs
    While offering free basic functionality, advanced features or higher usage may require a subscription, which can be a concern for budget-conscious users.
  • Performance Limitations
    In cases where the service handles a large volume of requests, the performance might be slower, impacting the speed of image generation.

Browsershots videos

+ Add

Browsershots.org behind the scenes

Web to Image videos

+ Add

Stop-and-Wait Protocol

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Browsershots and Web to Image)

Browsershots

Web to Image

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Screenshots
0 0%
Screenshots
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Browsershots and Web to Image. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Browsershots seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Browsershots mentions (2)

Web to Image mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Web to Image yet. Tracking of Web to Image recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Browsershots and Web to Image, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Fronty - Image to HTML converter powered by AI

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

HTMLCSS to Image API - Convert HTML to an image (jpg, png, webp). Renders images exactly like Google Chrome. Works with PHP, JavaScript, Ruby, .NET and more.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

GetScreenshot - Powerful & Affordable Screenshot API with a Zapier Integration

Loading...