Buffalo Go Framework Reviews

LNAV Reviews

Buffalo Go Framework mentions (12)

• Web-Framework equivalent to Nest.js in golang?

  Maybe https://gobuffalo.io/en/ is the closest one, 🤔. Source: over 2 years ago

• Golang for backend

  There's nothing like Django for Go, I believe the closest would be Buffalo, typically when building backends in Go you pick and choose a combination of standard library packages and third party packages to build your services. Source: over 2 years ago

• Enigma Virtual Box – Application Virtualization System for Windows

  These seem to be a way to embed all files to one executeable binary. Similar for Windows is https://github.com/sudachen/Molebox Others: - C/C++ has linker to link all to one binary - CLI/webserver only https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan like https://redbean.dev . Same exe works on many x64 OS like Windows/macOS/Linux/BSD, it embeds .zip file and can read/write to embedded .zip on the fly. - AppImage... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• why do big projects like docker, hugo, terraform, traefik, cockroachdb, influxdb etc used golang despite all these gotchas and caveats?

  If you want to build a website with Go, first of you don't need nginx or caddy. Go's standard library web server is fantastic. One thing I find with Go is that because it's powerful enough to build a great web server, memory cache, or database, you can solve problems at a lower level. This is something I personally find really fun. If you want a full-on web formwork experience checkout https://gobuffalo.io/en/.... Source: over 2 years ago

• A Love Letter to Ruby and Rails

  It's early days but so far I've quite enjoyed my experience with Buffalo (Golang) framework [1], which mostly copies from Rails. Get Go performance and static typing. Definitely some rough patches, but overall still quite an enjoyable experience (so far). [1] https://gobuffalo.io/en/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

LNAV mentions (61)

• ht: Headless Terminal

  As others have kinda alluded to, it could be useful for testing TUI applications. I develop a logfile viewer for the terminal (https://lnav.org) and have a similar application[1] for testing, but it's a bit flaky. It produces/checks snapshots like [2]. I think the problems I run into are more around different versions of ncurses producing slightly different outputs. [1] - - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago

• Ask HN: Interesting TUIs (text user interfaces), maybe forgotten ones?

  The Logfile Navigator (https://lnav.org) is a log file viewer/merger/tailer for the terminal. It has some advanced UX features, like showing previews of operations and displaying context sensitive help. For example, the preview for filtering out logs by regex is to highlight the lines that will be hidden in red. This can make crafting the right regex a bit easier since the preview updates as you type. lnav... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

• Angle-grinder: Slice and dice logs on the command line

  See https://lnav.org for a powerful mini-ETL CLI power tool; it embeds SQLite, supports ~every format, has great UX and easily handles a few million rows at a time. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

• Toolong: Terminal application to view, tail, merge, and search log files

  The code base seems like a good reference as a small Python project. My fav option in this class of apps: https://lnav.org/ It lets you use journalctl with pipes as requested here: https://github.com/Textualize/toolong/issues/4. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Logdy.dev – web based logs viewer UI for local development environment

  For local development, I cannot recommend lnav[1] enough. Discovering this tool was a game changer in my day to day life. Adding comments, filtering in/out, prettify and analyse distribution is hard to live without now. I don't think a browser tool would fit in my workflow. I need to pipe the output to the tool. [1] https://lnav.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago