Based on our record, Flox should be more popular than Bugout. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To avoid adding an extra table to the database, which we would need for storing which image belongs to which entry, we will use resources from Bugout.dev. This approach is used to simplify our infrastructure, but, if required, this step can be substituted for creating a new table in your database and writing an API for creating, modifying, and deleting data about the stored images. Bugout.dev is open source and... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Once you set up an integration and instrument your code, you can access your user reports at https://bugout.dev. This gives you a live view of what your users are experiencing:. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
At Bugout.dev (https://bugout.dev/) we've built a product that helps maintainers of APIs, libraries, and command line tools understand:. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Hi guys, we’ve built Bugout.dev (https://bugout.dev/) for maintains of an API, a library, or a command line tool. Bugout collects usage metrics and crash reports to help you understand what your users experience when they use your software. Source: about 4 years ago
Is the objective to get inside a container to do dev stuff? Reminds me of https://www.jetify.com/devbox and https://flox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
I think it's a bad addition since it pushes people towards a worse solution to a common problem. Using "go tool" forces you to have a bunch of dependencies in your go.mod that can conflict with your software's real dependency requirements, when there's zero reason those matter. You shouldn't have to care if one of your developer tools depends on a different version of a library than you. It makes it so the tools... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I think that's a bit reductive, but I get the intent. A lot of people see systemic problems in their development and turn to tools to reduce the cognitive load, busywork, or just otherwise automate a solution. For example "we always argue over formatting" -> use an automated formatter. That makes total sense as long as managing/interacting with the tool is less work, not just different work. With Nix I still think... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Try flox [0]. It's an imperative frontend for Nix that I've been using. I don't know how to use nix-shell/flakes or whatever it is they do now, but flox makes it easy to just install stuff. [0]: https://flox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
If you like NixOs and virtual development environments, perhaps try https://www.jetify.com/devbox or https://flox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
LaunchKit - Open Source - A popular suite of developer tools, now 100% open source.
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
SmallDevTools - Handy developer tools with a delightful interface
devenv - Fast, Declarative, Reproducible, and Composable dev envs
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
DevBox - Everyday utilities for the everyday developer