Bulma VS LiveChat
Compare Bulma VS LiveChat and see what are their differences
Sales pipeline software that gets you organized. Helps you focus on the right deals, so easy to use that salespeople just love it. Great for small teams.
featured
Bulma
Tailwind CSS
Bootstrap
Materialize CSS
Foundation
Semantic UI
UIKit
Material UI
LiveChat
Intercom
tawk.to
LiveAgent
Freshdesk
Zendesk
Crisp Chat
Olark
LiveChatBased on our record, Bulma seems to be a lot more popular than LiveChat. While we know about 109 links to Bulma, we've tracked only 2 mentions of LiveChat. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Tailwind is great, but creating everything from scratch is annoying. A nice base of components which can be extended with tailwind would be great. There are a few tailwind frameworks like Flowbite, Daisy Ui, but I like Bulma, PicoCSS and Bootstrap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I would talk about building the frontend, but it is just a single page React app I built quickly. It does use a CSS library called Bulma, which is similar to tailwind and worth checking out. I did spend a day implementing a login/signup page, but this was just for the learning experience, and not what I wanted in the final product. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
After finding a few spare hours I decided to address the alerts and update some my dependencies. I spent several hours debugging my Gatsby site after doing some recommended npm package updates. My UI class library Bulma was not being loaded by my sass-loader module. (I later learned that they migrated to dart-sass so I guess the fix should have been a pretty easy). Nonetheless, this prompted me to rethink my... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Oh wow, quite happy about this, for a while it seemed the project was abandoned, really glad Jeremy keeps working on this :) The new website (https://bulma.io/) also looks very slick. I could totally see that he'd be able to monetize this like Tailwind, it's a really well thought-out framework with a good compromise between responsiveness, utility classes and components. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
So, our post.component.html component is the generic page where all posts will have their content loaded. Here, the classes are from the Bulma CSS framework, and the template looks like this:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Some of it is going to depend on your budget and needs. Many (most?) livechat providers offer WP functionality. For example, livechat.com has a free WP plugin to offer livechat on WP sites:. Source: about 2 years ago
I am free to use any existing library or whatnot, what I was wondering is how easy it is to implement and deploy. I'm not being asked to build a full live chat from scratch, just try and implement a solution that won't add monthly charges to the predicted monthly cost of the website (ie pre-made solutions such as livechat.com that would cost atleast $16/mo). Source: over 3 years ago
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Intercom - Intercom is a customer relationship management and messaging tool for web businesses. Build relationships with users to create loyal customers.
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page
Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
LiveAgent - LiveAgent is a fully-featured web-based live chat and help desk software. It harnesses the power of a universal inbox, real-time live chat, built-in call center, and a robust customer service portal. Start your free 1 month trial today!