Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Buoyant VS Red Hat OpenShift

Compare Buoyant VS Red Hat OpenShift and see what are their differences

Buoyant logo Buoyant

Buoyant builds open source software to help companies run their infrastructure safely, securely, and reliably.

Red Hat OpenShift logo Red Hat OpenShift

Application and Data, Application Hosting, and Platform as a Service
  • Buoyant Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • Red Hat OpenShift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-01

Buoyant features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Red Hat OpenShift features and specs

  • Integration with Red Hat Ecosystem
    OpenShift offers tight integration with Red Hat's extensive ecosystem, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Red Hat Ansible Automation, and Red Hat Middleware, providing a seamless experience for enterprises already using Red Hat products.
  • Comprehensive Security Features
    OpenShift provides robust security features including fine-grained access controls, built-in OAuth authentication, and automatic security updates, making it easier to maintain a secure containerized environment.
  • Enterprise Support
    Red Hat offers professional, enterprise-grade support for OpenShift, providing an added layer of reliability and assistance for resolving issues and ensuring smooth operations.
  • Consistent Hybrid Cloud Experience
    OpenShift provides a consistent platform across on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid cloud environments, enabling organizations to avoid vendor lock-in and deploy applications flexibly.
  • Developer-Friendly Tools
    Features like integrated CI/CD pipelines, automated build and deploy processes, and a rich set of developer tools make it easier for developers to create and deploy applications quickly.

Possible disadvantages of Red Hat OpenShift

  • Complexity
    OpenShift can be complex to set up and manage, especially for teams that are not already familiar with Kubernetes and container orchestration concepts.
  • Cost
    The enterprise version of OpenShift can be expensive, which might be a barrier for small businesses or startups.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve associated with OpenShift, requiring significant time and effort to master, particularly for organizations new to container management and orchestration.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running OpenShift can be resource-intensive, demanding substantial CPU, memory, and storage resources, which could be a challenge for smaller or resource-constrained environments.
  • Dependency on Red Hat Technologies
    While integration with Red Hat's ecosystem is a pro, it could also be a con for organizations that do not use Red Hat products or prefer to avoid dependency on a single vendor for their software stack.

Buoyant videos

Buoyant by Derrick Adams - Exhibition Review

More videos:

  • Review - FULL MYTHIC BEE REVIEW (BUOYANT BEE AND PRECISE BEE) ROBLOX BEE SWARM SIMULATOR
  • Review - Scuba Review Buoyant Emergency Ascent

Red Hat OpenShift videos

Red Hat OpenShift overview

More videos:

  • Demo - Red Hat OpenShift 4.3 Demo with Shadow-Soft

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buoyant and Red Hat OpenShift)
DevOps Tools
10 10%
90% 90
Continuous Integration And Delivery
Developer Tools
26 26%
74% 74
Other Infrastructure Tools

User comments

Share your experience with using Buoyant and Red Hat OpenShift. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buoyant should be more popular than Red Hat OpenShift. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buoyant mentions (3)

  • eBPF, sidecars, and the future of the service mesh
    William: I'm devoting all my energy to Linkerd and Buoyant. That takes up most of my focus. Outside of work, I'm a dad. My kids are learning the piano, so I decided to start learning, too. It's humbling to see how fast they pick it up compared to me. As an adult learner, it's a slow process. It's interesting to be in a role where I'm the student, taking lessons from a teacher who's probably a third my age and... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Tokio Console
    At my day job (https://buoyant.io/), we're using it to write a reverse proxy/load balancer --- one of the use-cases where you really, absolutely do need asynchronous concurrency. :). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Launch HN: Buoyant (YC S21) – Blimp drones for air freight
    Not to be confused with the other Buoyant [1], the company behind the linkerd service mesh. Not that I'm really into service meshes, but I happened to be doing some reading about the Tokio async runtime for Rust yesterday, and a lot of the work on that has been funded by that Buoyant, which is why that company was on my mind. [1]: https://buoyant.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Red Hat OpenShift mentions (1)

  • The biggest threats to Red Hat’s Linux market share will come from the companies that make it easiest for developers to do their jobs.
    There is a free Openshift sandbox you can deploy here: https://developers.redhat.com/products/openshift/getting-started. Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buoyant and Red Hat OpenShift, you can also consider the following products

Delve Debugger - Delve is a debugger for the Go programming language.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Packer - Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.

HHVM - HHVM is an open-source virtual machine designed for executing programs written in Hack and PHP.