Build and deploy full-stack apps that scale. Create user-facing apps, internal tools, workflow automation, and more end-to-end. Get started in minutes, master it in hours. No prior development experience is necessary.
With a focus on a powerful drag-and-drop interface to build front-end, along with an easy-to-use custom data table builder that generates automated crud APIs and CMS, and a graph-based workflow builder to bring data from existing data sources and 3rd party integrations easily, while allowing you to create logic-based workflows and testing at the same time along with complete documentation, Canonic becomes a powerful tool to do full stack application development.
Based on our record, Semantic UI should be more popular than Canonic. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Take a look at one of the linked services https://canonic.dev/ This is what the future looks like, but without dragging and dropping. It's just a bunch of blocks stacked in grids, columns, and rows. This is what GUI and UX has become. Just black text on white rectangles, because it needs to adapt to every form factor, be accessible, be internationizable, be blahblahblabhlabblahblahblah. It has to be generic. GenUI... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Canonic’s been quite helpful for us for some of our internal tooling. Source: about 1 year ago
Could this work for you? https://canonic.dev. Source: about 2 years ago
Check out https://canonic.dev/. Lots of potential. Source: over 2 years ago
If you're new to Canonic, I recommend reading about our product and how we're trying to reduce backend development time and effort ,through an intuitive low-code platform, before you move on further to learn about our new developments for Disrupt 2021. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Semantic UI[1] was one I used to use, both the plain CSS one as well as the React version of the library. Version 3.0 is coming (eventually), which has left it a bit outdated for a while, but it's still a solid UI library imho. I have been switching away to Tailwind. [1]: https://semantic-ui.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
What stack are you using? I personally recommend utilizing readily available components: https://ui.shadcn.com/ https://mui.com/ https://semantic-ui.com/ etc.. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Honestly you should build a webpage and use a UI library if you want markdown with some extra pop. Check out semantic ui. Source: over 1 year ago
A lot of proof-of-concept and MVP projects start out with a number of libraries meant to be temporary. Maybe the app was using Chakra UI for its modal and custom buttons, while the rest of the imported library is just dead weight. Perhaps developers have been spending more time adjusting Semantic UI’s styling to match the designs than it’s worth. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Airtable - Airtable works like a spreadsheet but gives you the power of a database to organize anything. Sign up for free.
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
TreeLine - TreeLine just stores almost any kind of information.
Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
DBacked - Simple, secure database backup as a service 🛠️
UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces