Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Canonical VS GlusterFS

Compare Canonical VS GlusterFS and see what are their differences

Canonical logo Canonical

Canonical is the leading managed private cloud provider. We will build, support and manage your Ubuntu Kubernetes private cloud for only $5-15 per server per day.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
  • Canonical Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-19
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10

Canonical videos

Ubuntu and Canonical: 3 Things You Probably Didn't Know

More videos:

  • Review - Want A Job At Canonical? Write A 5000 Word Essay?!?
  • Review - Mark Shuttleworth - Canonical Vision

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Canonical and GlusterFS)
Cloud Computing
6 6%
94% 94
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Containers And Microservices

User comments

Share your experience with using Canonical and GlusterFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Canonical and GlusterFS

Canonical Reviews

OpenShift alternatives
The biggest advantages of Canonical Kubernetes are flexibility and low cost of deployment. “Charmed Kubernetes” is an exciting operator-based approach to build infrastructures. “Charms” is a collection to seamlessly integrate and manage Kubernetes, container and VM-based applications across hybrid cloud environments. Canonical Kubernetes uses Ubuntu as operating system.
Source: www.ionos.com

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Canonical mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Canonical yet. Tracking of Canonical recommendations started around Oct 2022.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Canonical and GlusterFS, you can also consider the following products

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

AWS Elastic Beanstalk - Quickly deploy and manage applications in the AWS cloud.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Jotform - Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator

rkt - App Container runtime