Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Canonical VS localhost.run

Compare Canonical VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

ICT CLOUD
ICT CLOUD EMEA's Global Award-Winning Cloud Service Provider featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Canonical logo Canonical

Canonical is the leading managed private cloud provider. We will build, support and manage your Ubuntu Kubernetes private cloud for only $5-15 per server per day.

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • Canonical Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-19
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Canonical videos

+ Add

Ubuntu and Canonical: 3 Things You Probably Didn't Know

More videos:

  • Review - Want A Job At Canonical? Write A 5000 Word Essay?!?
  • Review - Mark Shuttleworth - Canonical Vision

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Canonical and localhost.run)

Canonical

localhost.run

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
Localhost Tools
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Canonical and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Canonical and localhost.run

Canonical Reviews

OpenShift alternatives
The biggest advantages of Canonical Kubernetes are flexibility and low cost of deployment. “Charmed Kubernetes” is an exciting operator-based approach to build infrastructures. “Charms” is a collection to seamlessly integrate and manage Kubernetes, container and VM-based applications across hybrid cloud environments. Canonical Kubernetes uses Ubuntu as operating system.
Source: www.ionos.com

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Canonical mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Canonical yet. Tracking of Canonical recommendations started around Oct 2022.

localhost.run mentions (41)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Canonical and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk - Quickly deploy and manage applications in the AWS cloud.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Jotform - Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator

LocalXpose - Bye Bye Localhost, Hello World!

Loading...