Based on our record, Coolify should be more popular than Ceph. It has been mentiond 56 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Ceph stands out in storage technology, offering a scalable and reliable solution where traditional systems fall short. It supports object, block, and file storage in one system, adaptable for various environments including on-premises, cloud, or container-native setups. Key benefits include scalability, enabled by the CRUSH algorithm, allowing for expansion without typical downtime. This makes Ceph suitable for... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
With that being said, you better take a look at something more WAN optimized and more secure, like S3 storage. You can build the S3 storage (and gain immutability) using something like MinIO (https://min.io/) or Ceph (https://ceph.io/en/) or check out Object First Ootbi offerings - https://objectfirst.com/object-storage/ (I work for them). Source: 11 months ago
I believe Ceph [1] could be a good alternative. It can be self hosted and I believe some cloud providers also offer it. Here are some differences between S3 and Ceph [2]. [1] - https://ceph.io/en/ [2] - https://www.lightbitslabs.com/blog/ceph-storage/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Another option is a distributed Ceph cluster https://ceph.io/en/. Source: almost 2 years ago
There's also cool systems like https://ceph.io/en/ that could be efficient if willing to set up and learn. Source: almost 2 years ago
Solutions like pocketbase and coolify come close to solving these problems. However, I wouldn't choose either as I fear architecture lock-in as much as vendor lock-in. Especially in the case of pocketbase, I may be forced to rewrite my application if it were to scale overnight. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
This is my first quick try deploying SvelteKit with the open source software Coolify by Andras Bacsai. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
With a serverful approach, you can avoid these drawbacks, and the main challenge lies in selecting the platform that aligns with your requirements. Options may include AWS, Render, DigitalOcean, and others. While VPS is also an option, it's generally not recommended due to the significant setup and maintenance overhead involved (logging, monitoring, CI/CD pipelines, etc.). However, you can make your life easier by... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Heroku and similar providers can simplify the server management issues, but you can use something much better that can combine both cost efficiency and ease of deployment—Coolify:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
> VPSs being “easy to manage” is a strong option full of assumptions. There are definitely many footguns with managing a VPS but I think the threshold to get vaguely competent with a VPS is not really that far off with getting familiar with the average cloud platform - which comes with its own dangers, like the near-total inability to put an upward cap on fees that that person found out with Netlify recently.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.
CapRover - Build your own PaaS in a few minutes!
GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
StorPool - StorPool is designed from the ground up to provide cloud builders, shared hosting providers and MSPs with the most resource efficient storage software on the market.
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.