Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ceylon VS Play Framework

Compare Ceylon VS Play Framework and see what are their differences

Ceylon logo Ceylon

Ceylon is a language designed specifically for writing large programs in teams.

Play Framework logo Play Framework

An open source web framework which follows the model-view-controller architecture. It is light-weight, web-friendly, and stateless. It provides minimal overhead for highly-scalable applications.
  • Ceylon Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10
  • Play Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-23

Ceylon features and specs

  • Type Safety
    Ceylon offers a strong static type system that helps catch errors at compile-time, reducing runtime issues.
  • Modular System
    Ceylon has a built-in module system that facilitates large-scale application development and dependency management.
  • Interoperability
    Ceylon runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), allowing it to interoperate with Java code and libraries seamlessly.
  • Readable Syntax
    The language is designed with readability in mind, using clear and concise syntax that is easy to understand.
  • Developer Tools
    Ceylon provides a suite of tools, including a powerful IDE (Integrated Development Environment) and a command-line interface, to enhance developer productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Ceylon

  • Limited Community
    Ceylon has a smaller community compared to more established languages like Java, which can lead to fewer third-party resources and community support.
  • Market Adoption
    There is relatively low market adoption of Ceylon, which might influence its usefulness for certain projects and its support in industry.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to other languages, there could be a learning curve involved in mastering Ceylon's unique features and syntax.
  • Compatibility
    Even though Ceylon is interoperable with Java, integrating it into existing ecosystems can entail some compatibility challenges.
  • Performance
    While Ceylon runs on the JVM, achieving performance optimizations might require additional effort compared to native Java code.

Play Framework features and specs

  • Scalability
    The Play Framework is built with scalability in mind, making it easier to develop applications that can handle a large number of simultaneous users and requests.
  • Reactive Programming
    Play is based on a reactive programming model, which allows it to handle asynchronous tasks efficiently. This results in better performance and resource utilization.
  • Hot Reloading
    Play supports hot reloading, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without needing to restart the server. This feature boosts productivity by speeding up the development cycle.
  • Java and Scala Support
    The framework supports both Java and Scala, accommodating a wide range of developers and allowing teams to choose their preferred language.
  • Built-in Testing
    Play has built-in support for writing unit and functional tests, offering a comprehensive test framework to ensure code quality and reliability.
  • RESTful by Default
    Play makes it straightforward to build RESTful web services, simplifying the construction of APIs and ensuring that they adhere to REST principles.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The Play Framework boasts extensive and detailed documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to common problems.

Possible disadvantages of Play Framework

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might find Play’s reactive model and functional programming concepts challenging, especially if they are primarily experienced with traditional web frameworks.
  • Memory Usage
    Play applications can be memory-intensive, which might lead to higher hosting costs compared to lighter frameworks, especially for smaller applications.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring a Play application can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for beginners or small teams without extensive experience.
  • Limited Community Support
    Although Play has a dedicated user base, its community is smaller compared to more popular web frameworks like Spring or Django, potentially making it difficult to find solutions and community-driven resources.
  • Verbose Code
    Play applications may require a significant amount of boilerplate code, particularly when integrating with other services or libraries, leading to potentially verbose and less maintainable codebases.

Ceylon videos

Ceylon Review With Graeme Anderson

More videos:

  • Review - Ceylon Review
  • Review - Ceylon Review by Man vs Meeple (Ludonova)

Play Framework videos

The Play Framework at LinkedIn: Productivity and Performance at Scale

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ceylon and Play Framework)
Web Frameworks
29 29%
71% 71
Developer Tools
29 29%
71% 71
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Development
32 32%
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using Ceylon and Play Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ceylon and Play Framework

Ceylon Reviews

We have no reviews of Ceylon yet.
Be the first one to post

Play Framework Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Play Framework brings Scala and Java into harmony, offering a backstage pass to simplistic, asynchronous web development. No song and dance, just straightforward high-octane performance.
17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
The Play Framework makes it possible to build lightweight and web-friendly Java and Scala applications for desktop and mobile. Play is a hugely popular framework, used by brands such as LinkedIn, Samsung, Walmart, The Guardian, Verizon, and many others.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Play is written using Scala Programming Language. It offers web and mobile application development. It follows MVC architecture. Play is compiled to Java-Bytecode, and this makes Play one of the most powerful frameworks.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Play Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ceylon mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ceylon yet. Tracking of Ceylon recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Play Framework mentions (1)

  • Examples of CompletableFuture-based APIs / state of async in Java?
    I can see the Play framework really leans into async, and only tolerates blocking controllers. What else is out there? Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ceylon and Play Framework, you can also consider the following products

Dolphin Smalltalk - Dolphin is a complete development IDE for Smalltalk targeted specifically at Microsoft Windows.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

Adonis JS - AdonisJs is a Node.js web framework with breath of fresh air and drizzle of elegant syntax on top of it