Chocolatey VS Protobuf
Compare Chocolatey VS Protobuf and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
Chocolatey
Ninite
Scoop
Homebrew
Just Install
Patch My PC
PDQ Deploy
WAPT Community
Protobuf
gRPC
Messagepack
TOML
YAML
Apache Thrift
JSON
Avro
Chocolatey ProtobufBased on our record, Chocolatey should be more popular than Protobuf. It has been mentiond 252 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 7 months ago
For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.
gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows
Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language