Chocolatey Reviews

WireGuard Reviews

Chocolatey mentions (252)

• Let’s build AI-tools with the help of AI and Typescript!

  Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Giving Kyma a little spin ... a SpinKube

  Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Effective Neovim Setup. A Beginner’s Guide

  On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Need Help with getting Haskell onto my Windows Laptop

  I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 7 months ago

• Python Versions and Release Cycles

  For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

WireGuard mentions (9)

• Remote access from work/corporate network

  Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 1 year ago

• Central reverse-proxy ssh access?

  Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 1 year ago

• Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]

  We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 1 year ago

• Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale

  Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: over 1 year ago

• Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519

  Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: over 1 year ago