Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CMU Common Lisp VS pacman (package manager)

Compare CMU Common Lisp VS pacman (package manager) and see what are their differences

ICT CLOUD
ICT CLOUD EMEA's Global Award-Winning Cloud Service Provider featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CMU Common Lisp logo CMU Common Lisp

CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

pacman (package manager) logo pacman (package manager)

The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...
  • CMU Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15
  • pacman (package manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMU Common Lisp and pacman (package manager))

CMU Common Lisp

pacman (package manager)

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CMU Common Lisp and pacman (package manager). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pacman (package manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CMU Common Lisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CMU Common Lisp yet. Tracking of CMU Common Lisp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pacman (package manager) mentions (39)

  • Been thinking of switching to linux but I am a noob
    However, that "pacman -S" command has lots of switches (see section 1.1.1 ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman ). Source: 7 months ago
  • How to build Software as a Service (SaaS) Notes application with mySQL/MariaDB and Apache in 300 lines of code
    Install Vely - you can use standard packaging tools such as apt, dnf, pacman or zypper. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Project on GitHub - Customizable Arch Linux Podman images based on the official Arch Linux Docker image
    Automatic installation of packages during building utilizes pacman and aurman with the supported "package sources" being:. Source: 11 months ago
  • A response to the Fedora 40 Privacy-Preserving Telemetry Proposal
    * Package management and DNF syntax usage are big topics. Follow the Arch Wiki example for the "pacman" package management tool ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman. Source: 12 months ago
  • Could someone make a Decky plugin that automates installing common dependencies?
    Should be possible as the Arch distro SteamOS is built on includes pacman. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMU Common Lisp and pacman (package manager), you can also consider the following products

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

Loading...