Based on our record, Codecademy seems to be a lot more popular than CodeClimate. While we know about 113 links to Codecademy, we've tracked only 11 mentions of CodeClimate. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 2 years ago
Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago
TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
However, a little research was enough to dispel that misconception. Yes, there was a technical aspect to programming, but most developers weren't doing complex calculations all the time. So, my preconceptions faded away and turned into great curiosity and interest. I started studying JavaScript, HTML, and CSS on YouTube and also studied on Codecademy platform. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
Codecademy is a freemium platform with high-quality content. Their courses range from web development to data science, and are interactive and text-based. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
If you really have decided to become the next Guru on Scratch then you should learn at least one real programming language like JavaScript. I found this JavaScript course very useful: https://learnjavascript.online/. You can also learn Java and Python on codecademy.com. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Codecademy.com makes use of a similar approach to the one you mentioned in order to teach JavaScript (and HTML and CSS), giving immediate feedback for the code you write on your browser (except that it uses the browser, as mentioned, instead of an IDE). Source: 12 months ago
Codecademy offers interactive coding courses for various programming languages, including Python and JavaScript. It provides a hands-on learning experience and offers a free trial to get started. codecademy.com. Source: about 1 year ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Udemy - Online Courses - Learn Anything, On Your Schedule
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Coursera - Build skills with courses, certificates, and degrees online from world-class universities and companies
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
edX - Best Courses. Top Institutions. Learn anytime, anywhere.