CodeClimate Reviews

interviewing.io Reviews

CodeClimate mentions (11)

• free-for.dev

  Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How To Use Code Climate To Improve Software Quality

  Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: about 2 years ago

• RFC: A Full-stack Analytics Platform Architecture

  Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Adding coverage to CI pipeline?

  The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago

• Node.js best practices list (July 2021)

  TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

interviewing.io mentions (97)

• Rebooting (something like) early Triplebyte

  How is this different than https://interviewing.io/ ? - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago

• Ask HN: Any previous experience with interviewing.io dedicated coaches?

  Interviewing.io[1] lets users to practice mock interviews (coding interviews) with peers or professional interviewers. These interviews are anonymous. They also offer mentorship sessions with “dedicated coaches” from FAANG or other backgrounds. They claim 99% satisfaction rate and 82% of success (landing a job in the desired company). It sounds really vague and difficult to verify due to the anonymous aspect. Does... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Guidance for cracking coding interviews

  There is also https://interviewing.io/, but that platform is a rip off. Either you need to pay an arm and a leg, or you need to trade two interviews that you do for others in exchange for a single interview that you receive. Pramp is much better in that respect. With Pramp, you interview the other job-hunter for 30 minutes and they interview you for 30 minutes. It's a much fairer exchange. Source: 7 months ago

• Failing C++ Job Interviews

  There are also some services I've used in the past like https://interviewing.io/ that give mock interviews with actual feedback from a human instead of the blank wall that is every company's recruiting team (I think they will give you a few mock interviews for free in exchange for the chance to refer you to a few tech companies.). Source: 8 months ago

• I'm Sorry I Bit You During My Job Interview

  I'm not affiliated with them, but it seems like paying for a one time consultation/mock interview through https://interviewing.io/ might help uncover something useful. It does suck to have to pay to hear the "other side". Is this "Honesty as a Service"..? - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago