Based on our record, ReviewMeta.com should be more popular than CodeClimate. It has been mentiond 86 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 2 years ago
Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago
TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I'd suggest using both FakeSpot and ReviewMeta together. In the end though, neither should be treated as perfect. They both can give skewed ratings on legitimately good products. It just helps give an idea of if you should be cautious and look into things more before purchasing. Source: about 1 year ago
I recommend https://reviewmeta.com if you want to see if the reviews are authentic or not. Source: about 1 year ago
This does a pretty good job of filtering out the crap - https://reviewmeta.com/. Source: about 1 year ago
This is only for amazon, but https://reviewmeta.com/ checks if reviews under a product are likely to be real or not. Source: about 1 year ago
I'll also double-check those Amazon reviews with a tool like Reviewmeta to see if they have a high number of suspicious or fake-sounding ratings or comments. Source: over 1 year ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Fakespot - Fakespot spots, analyzes and identifies fake reviews - helping you out when buying stuff online
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Feedback Whiz - Feedback Whiz is a useful platform providing the best-in-class seller tools that allows you to automatically monitor all critical events on product listings on the Amazon platform.
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool
TheReviewIndex - An Amazon review summarizer using neural networks