Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Content Grabber VS Apache Flink

Compare Content Grabber VS Apache Flink and see what are their differences

Content Grabber logo Content Grabber

Content Grabber is an automated web scraping tool.

Apache Flink logo Apache Flink

Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.
  • Content Grabber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11
  • Apache Flink Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Content Grabber videos

Tutorial Web Scrapping - Content Grabber - Telelistas

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Web scraping Zomato - Tutorial Content Grabber - Learning Web Scraping
  • Review - Content Grabber 2.0 what is new?

Apache Flink videos

GOTO 2019 • Introduction to Stateful Stream Processing with Apache Flink • Robert Metzger

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Apache Flink Tutorial | Flink vs Spark | Real Time Analytics Using Flink | Apache Flink Training
  • Tutorial - How to build a modern stream processor: The science behind Apache Flink - Stefan Richter

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Content Grabber and Apache Flink)
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Big Data
0 0%
100% 100
Data Extraction
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Content Grabber and Apache Flink. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Flink seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 30 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Content Grabber mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Content Grabber yet. Tracking of Content Grabber recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Flink mentions (30)

  • Show HN: Restate, low-latency durable workflows for JavaScript/Java, in Rust
    Restate is built as a sharded replicated state machine similar to how TiKV (https://tikv.org/), Kudu (https://kudu.apache.org/kudu.pdf) or CockroachDB (https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach) since it makes it possible to tune the system more easily for different deployment scenarios (on-prem, cloud, cost-effective blob storage). Moreover, it allows for some other cool things like seamlessly moving from one log... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
  • Array Expansion in Flink SQL
    I’ve recently started my journey with Apache Flink. As I learn certain concepts, I’d like to share them. One such "learning" is the expansion of array type columns in Flink SQL. Having used ksqlDB in a previous life, I was looking for functionality similar to the EXPLODE function to "flatten" a collection type column into a row per element of the collection. Because Flink SQL is ANSI compliant, it’s no surprise... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Show HN: An SQS Alternative on Postgres
    You should let the Apache Flink team know, they mention exactly-once processing on their home page (under "correctness guarantees") and in their list of features. [0] https://flink.apache.org/ [1] https://flink.apache.org/what-is-flink/flink-applications/#building-blocks-for-streaming-applications. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Top 10 Common Data Engineers and Scientists Pain Points in 2024
    Data scientists often prefer Python for its simplicity and powerful libraries like Pandas or SciPy. However, many real-time data processing tools are Java-based. Take the example of Kafka, Flink, or Spark streaming. While these tools have their Python API/wrapper libraries, they introduce increased latency, and data scientists need to manage dependencies for both Python and JVM environments. For example,... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Content Grabber and Apache Flink, you can also consider the following products

import.io - Import. io helps its users find the internet data they need, organize and store it, and transform it into a format that provides them with the context they need.

Apache Spark - Apache Spark is an engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing.

Octoparse - Octoparse provides easy web scraping for anyone. Our advanced web crawler, allows users to turn web pages into structured spreadsheets within clicks.

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.