Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
PVS-Studio
Parasoft C/C++test
lgtm.com
Polyspace
RivalSense
Klue
Kompyte
iSpionage
Crayon
Watch My Competitor
Rivalyzer
Visualping
At RivalSense, we understand that as a founder or executive, your time is precious. You need to stay ahead of your competitors without getting bogged down in endless research. That's where RivalSense steps in—a powerful AI tool designed to streamline your competitive intelligence efforts.
RivalSense harnesses advanced AI to connect with over 80 public sources, curating the most crucial insights relevant to your business model. From monitoring new hires and layoffs to tracking market entries and pricing adjustments, RivalSense delivers these insights directly to your inbox. Every week, you’ll receive short, crisp updates that cut through the noise, allowing you to focus on what truly matters—building your business and delighting your customers.
Traditional news sources might keep you informed, but only to a point. RivalSense goes beyond the usual, tapping into a range of non-traditional sources like employee social media posts, government registers, and GitHub repositories. This unique approach enables us to unearth valuable information that others might overlook, ensuring you're not just keeping up, but staying ahead.
Cppcheck RivalSenseBased on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 1 year ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Klue - Klue is competitive intelligence for enterprise sales. We help sales, and the teams who enable them, leverage CI to win more deals.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Kompyte - Track & analyze competitors in real time.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
iSpionage - AdWords competitor keywords with the click of a button and monitor competitor PPC landing pages.
