There is a google docs form to fill out at the top of the ethos.io page ( I don't want to direct link it, not sure if it has identifiers in the URL?). Source: over 1 year ago

I hate pushing my opinion on folks (because I really do respect folks who want to be fully done and they're completely valid) but I really do think there should be at least some consideration to the waves or ethos.io proposals (or more due diligence since it seemed like Binance and a few other companies were involved). If FTX truly is the best deal fine, but I do think equity and our crypto being given back... Source: almost 2 years ago

4) Voyager took multiple years to switch simple systems and was called out by ethos.io and former board director https://twitter.com/shingolavine/status/1574472263247634432. Source: almost 2 years ago

Shingo Lavine who's company Ethos.io (that was acquired by Voyager) made a statement on this as well: https://twitter.com/shingolavine/status/1573030726139727872 stating that that app remake and sharing revenue plan might work well with their Ethos.io plan / proposal here: https://cases.stretto.com/public/x193/11753/PLEADINGS/1175307292280000000006.pdf. Source: almost 2 years ago

And that ethos.io was not rebranded into VOyager. Voyager bought Ethos....2 very different scenarios. Source: over 2 years ago

I am wondering if a company could be operate based on the software that is open source. For example, shuup.com. This business looks like they have provided code on Github(https://github.com/shuup/shuup). Is it a safe thing to do so? Wouldn't hackers abuse by knowing how the system works? If this is a normal thing to do, what are the ups and downs? Source: over 3 years ago