Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CyberArk Conjur VS Google Container security

Compare CyberArk Conjur VS Google Container security and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CyberArk Conjur logo CyberArk Conjur

Programmable open source interface that securely authenticates, controls and audits non-human access across tool stacks, apps, containers and cloud environments.

Google Container security logo Google Container security

Discover how to secure your Kubernetes Engine container environment on Google Cloud Platform (GCP).
  • CyberArk Conjur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-09
  • Google Container security Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

CyberArk Conjur features and specs

  • Strong Security Model
    CyberArk Conjur provides a robust security model with role-based access control and auditing to ensure that secrets are managed securely.
  • Cloud-native
    Conjur is built to integrate seamlessly with cloud environments, which makes it a good fit for organizations using modern cloud infrastructure and DevOps practices.
  • Ease of Integration
    It offers numerous integrations with platforms like Kubernetes, Ansible, and Jenkins, facilitating easy adoption in existing workflows and infrastructure.
  • Open Source Option
    Conjur offers an open-source version, allowing organizations to evaluate and customize the basic features according to their needs without initial licensing costs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    CyberArk Conjur provides detailed documentation and resources, which can help streamline the implementation and troubleshooting processes.

Possible disadvantages of CyberArk Conjur

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    Setting up Conjur within an existing infrastructure can be complex and may require specialized knowledge to configure correctly.
  • Cost
    While there is an open-source version available, the full suite and enterprise features of CyberArk Conjur can be expensive for some organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a steep learning curve due to the advanced security concepts and configurations involved.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a full-fledged Conjur system can require significant resources, which might be cumbersome for smaller setups or teams.
  • Limited Open-source Features
    The open-source version has limitations compared with the full enterprise product, potentially lacking some advanced features needed by larger organizations.

Google Container security features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Google Container security offers a wide range of security features such as vulnerability scanning, binary authorization, and network policies, which help in protecting containerized applications from various threats.
  • Integration with Google Cloud
    It seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services, offering a cohesive security environment that benefits from Google’s extensive infrastructure and security resources.
  • Automatic Security Updates
    Google Container security can automatically apply security patches and updates, ensuring that containers are protected against known vulnerabilities without requiring manual intervention.
  • Policy Enforcement
    Users can define and enforce security policies at scale, helping to maintain a consistent security posture across all containerized environments.
  • Scalability and Performance
    Being part of Google's infrastructure, it benefits from the scalability and performance enhancements of Google Cloud, ensuring that security features do not become a bottleneck.

Possible disadvantages of Google Container security

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and integrations can lead to a steep learning curve and complexity in managing and configuring security settings properly.
  • Cost
    While offering robust security, the cost can be significant, especially for smaller organizations or projects that may not fully utilize all features.
  • Dependency on Google Cloud
    Organizations that rely heavily on multi-cloud strategies may find the integration with Google Cloud a limitation if they want to use similar security features across different cloud providers.
  • Limited to Kubernetes
    This security solution is tailored for Kubernetes, which might limit its applicability if an organization uses multiple container orchestration platforms.
  • Potential Overhead
    Additional security features might introduce overhead, impacting the performance of containerized applications if not correctly configured or optimized.

CyberArk Conjur videos

+ Add

CyberArk Conjur CICD Demo

Google Container security videos

No Google Container security videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CyberArk Conjur and Google Container security)

CyberArk Conjur

Google Container security

Monitoring Tools
58 58%
Monitoring Tools
42% 42
Online Services
43 43%
Online Services
57% 57
Security
54 54%
Security
46% 46
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CyberArk Conjur and Google Container security. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CyberArk Conjur should be more popular than Google Container security. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CyberArk Conjur mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2021)
    CyberArk (Conjur team) | Mid-Snr Infrastructure Engineer | REMOTE OR NEWTON, MA | FULL-TIME The Conjur infrastructure team provides support and internal tooling to the product engineers working on Conjur and Conjur Enterprise as well as a suite of associated products and integrations. Our job is to make sure engineering has the tools and facilities available to do their jobs with minimal infra-related effort on... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Securing Kubernetes Secrets with Conjur
    Conjur.org Conjur OSS Helm Chart Kubernetes Conjur Demo My GitHub repo with all the resources used in the post. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Google Container security mentions (1)

  • Does the telecom industry need the cloud?
    For example, Google Cloud offers the Anthos solution to manage cloud networks, promising to modernize security with a zero trust security model‎, simplified patching and compliance, and centralized management. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CyberArk Conjur and Google Container security, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

SecretHub - SecretHub is a developer tool to help you keep database passwords, API tokens, and other secrets...

StackRox - StackRox provides an innovative and comprehensive solution with seamless integration for Kubernetes-native security that focuses on the container.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection - Symantec Cloud Workload Protection enables business agility and cost savings by automating security for public cloud workloads. Visit Symantec to learn more.

Loading...