Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CyberArk Conjur VS Lacework

Compare CyberArk Conjur VS Lacework and see what are their differences

CyberArk Conjur logo CyberArk Conjur

Programmable open source interface that securely authenticates, controls and audits non-human access across tool stacks, apps, containers and cloud environments.

Lacework logo Lacework

Lacework is a highly trusted platform that provides security for Cloud Environments, DevOps, and Containers.
  • CyberArk Conjur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-09
  • Lacework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-05

Lacework

$ Details
-
Release Date
2015 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
California
City
San Jose
Founder(s)
Mike Speiser
Employees
250 - 499

CyberArk Conjur features and specs

  • Strong Security Model
    CyberArk Conjur provides a robust security model with role-based access control and auditing to ensure that secrets are managed securely.
  • Cloud-native
    Conjur is built to integrate seamlessly with cloud environments, which makes it a good fit for organizations using modern cloud infrastructure and DevOps practices.
  • Ease of Integration
    It offers numerous integrations with platforms like Kubernetes, Ansible, and Jenkins, facilitating easy adoption in existing workflows and infrastructure.
  • Open Source Option
    Conjur offers an open-source version, allowing organizations to evaluate and customize the basic features according to their needs without initial licensing costs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    CyberArk Conjur provides detailed documentation and resources, which can help streamline the implementation and troubleshooting processes.

Possible disadvantages of CyberArk Conjur

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    Setting up Conjur within an existing infrastructure can be complex and may require specialized knowledge to configure correctly.
  • Cost
    While there is an open-source version available, the full suite and enterprise features of CyberArk Conjur can be expensive for some organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a steep learning curve due to the advanced security concepts and configurations involved.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a full-fledged Conjur system can require significant resources, which might be cumbersome for smaller setups or teams.
  • Limited Open-source Features
    The open-source version has limitations compared with the full enterprise product, potentially lacking some advanced features needed by larger organizations.

Lacework features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Coverage
    Lacework provides extensive security features including threat detection, vulnerability assessment, compliance, and cloud workload protection. This ensures that multiple aspects of cloud security are covered.
  • Automation and Ease of Use
    The platform offers automation and machine learning capabilities which can simplify complex security tasks and reduce the need for manual intervention, making it easier for teams to manage their security posture.
  • Scalable
    Lacework is designed to scale with your cloud infrastructure, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises with growing and complex cloud environments.
  • Native Cloud Integration
    Lacework integrates natively with major cloud providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, ensuring seamless operation and deeper visibility into cloud activities.
  • Detailed Insights and Analytics
    The platform provides deep visibility and rich context into activities across your cloud environment, offering detailed analytics and actionable insights to improve security policies.

Possible disadvantages of Lacework

  • Cost
    The pricing structure of Lacework can be expensive for smaller organizations or startups, potentially making it less accessible for those with limited budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Given its comprehensive set of features and capabilities, new users might find Lacework's platform complex and may require time and training to fully master it.
  • Over-reliance on Automation
    While automation is a significant benefit, it may lead to over-reliance, where critical security decisions are left to algorithms that may not always correctly interpret complex scenarios.
  • Potential False Positives
    There might be instances of false positives in threat detection, which can lead to unnecessary alerts and potential alert fatigue among security teams.
  • Integration Complexity
    Integrating Lacework with existing security tools and workflows can sometimes be complex and may require technical expertise to ensure smooth operation.

CyberArk Conjur videos

CyberArk Conjur CICD Demo

Lacework videos

Inside Lacework: Set Up Lacework with AWS

More videos:

  • Review - How Lacework Automates Security & Compliance for Flatiron Health

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CyberArk Conjur and Lacework)
Monitoring Tools
33 33%
67% 67
Security
27 27%
73% 73
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
20 20%
80% 80

User comments

Share your experience with using CyberArk Conjur and Lacework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CyberArk Conjur seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CyberArk Conjur mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2021)
    CyberArk (Conjur team) | Mid-Snr Infrastructure Engineer | REMOTE OR NEWTON, MA | FULL-TIME The Conjur infrastructure team provides support and internal tooling to the product engineers working on Conjur and Conjur Enterprise as well as a suite of associated products and integrations. Our job is to make sure engineering has the tools and facilities available to do their jobs with minimal infra-related effort on... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
  • Securing Kubernetes Secrets with Conjur
    Conjur.org Conjur OSS Helm Chart Kubernetes Conjur Demo My GitHub repo with all the resources used in the post. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Lacework mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Lacework yet. Tracking of Lacework recommendations started around Dec 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CyberArk Conjur and Lacework, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

SecretHub - SecretHub is a developer tool to help you keep database passwords, API tokens, and other secrets...

CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Protection - Cloud-based endpoint protection for businesses. The Falcon platform offers nex-gen endpoint security with an intelligent, easy-to-install lightweight agent.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Aqua Security - Aqua Security provides a security solution for virtual containers.