Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CyberArk Conjur VS StackRox

Compare CyberArk Conjur VS StackRox and see what are their differences

CyberArk Conjur logo CyberArk Conjur

Programmable open source interface that securely authenticates, controls and audits non-human access across tool stacks, apps, containers and cloud environments.

StackRox logo StackRox

StackRox provides an innovative and comprehensive solution with seamless integration for Kubernetes-native security that focuses on the container.
  • CyberArk Conjur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-09
  • StackRox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

CyberArk Conjur features and specs

  • Strong Security Model
    CyberArk Conjur provides a robust security model with role-based access control and auditing to ensure that secrets are managed securely.
  • Cloud-native
    Conjur is built to integrate seamlessly with cloud environments, which makes it a good fit for organizations using modern cloud infrastructure and DevOps practices.
  • Ease of Integration
    It offers numerous integrations with platforms like Kubernetes, Ansible, and Jenkins, facilitating easy adoption in existing workflows and infrastructure.
  • Open Source Option
    Conjur offers an open-source version, allowing organizations to evaluate and customize the basic features according to their needs without initial licensing costs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    CyberArk Conjur provides detailed documentation and resources, which can help streamline the implementation and troubleshooting processes.

Possible disadvantages of CyberArk Conjur

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    Setting up Conjur within an existing infrastructure can be complex and may require specialized knowledge to configure correctly.
  • Cost
    While there is an open-source version available, the full suite and enterprise features of CyberArk Conjur can be expensive for some organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a steep learning curve due to the advanced security concepts and configurations involved.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a full-fledged Conjur system can require significant resources, which might be cumbersome for smaller setups or teams.
  • Limited Open-source Features
    The open-source version has limitations compared with the full enterprise product, potentially lacking some advanced features needed by larger organizations.

StackRox features and specs

  • Kubernetes-Native Security
    StackRox is designed specifically for Kubernetes, providing native integration, which allows it to leverage Kubernetes' components for security rather than using an overlay approach.
  • Runtime Threat Detection
    It offers robust runtime threat detection capabilities to identify and address threats as they occur in real-time.
  • Vulnerability Management
    StackRox provides deep visibility into vulnerabilities within containers and across Kubernetes clusters, helping organizations to prioritize and address risks efficiently.
  • Policy Enforcement
    The platform allows for customizable policies to help enforce security best practices and compliance requirements across Kubernetes environments.
  • CI/CD Integration
    Offers integration with CI/CD pipelines to ensure that security tests are automated and embedded into the development process, minimizing security issues in production.

Possible disadvantages of StackRox

  • Kubernetes Dependency
    Being Kubernetes-native, its capabilities might be limited or less effective in environments that do not predominantly use Kubernetes.
  • Complexity of Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration might be complex and could require significant time and expertise to tailor the solution to specific environments.
  • Cost
    Depending on the scale and requirements, the cost of deploying and maintaining StackRox may be substantial compared to some other security solutions.
  • Learning Curve
    For teams that are new to Kubernetes or container security, there could be a steep learning curve to fully leverage StackRox's capabilities.
  • Limited Non-Kubernetes Features
    The focus on Kubernetes may mean limited features or optimizations for organizations that use a hybrid approach or alternative container orchestration platforms.

CyberArk Conjur videos

CyberArk Conjur CICD Demo

StackRox videos

Kamal Shah, StackRox | Sumo Logic Illuminate 2019

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CyberArk Conjur and StackRox)
Monitoring Tools
39 39%
61% 61
Security
34 34%
66% 66
Security & Privacy
73 73%
27% 27
Online Services
30 30%
70% 70

User comments

Share your experience with using CyberArk Conjur and StackRox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CyberArk Conjur and StackRox

CyberArk Conjur Reviews

We have no reviews of CyberArk Conjur yet.
Be the first one to post

StackRox Reviews

7 Best Container Security Tools & Solutions 2022
StackRox users have compliance capabilities to identify whether nodes and clusters conform to regulations and to adhere to Docker and Kubernetes CIS benchmarks. StackRox makes it easier to show data to auditors, too. StackRox allows businesses to remediate misconfigurations, including excessive privileges, and to create custom policies for configuring builds and deployments.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CyberArk Conjur seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CyberArk Conjur mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2021)
    CyberArk (Conjur team) | Mid-Snr Infrastructure Engineer | REMOTE OR NEWTON, MA | FULL-TIME The Conjur infrastructure team provides support and internal tooling to the product engineers working on Conjur and Conjur Enterprise as well as a suite of associated products and integrations. Our job is to make sure engineering has the tools and facilities available to do their jobs with minimal infra-related effort on... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
  • Securing Kubernetes Secrets with Conjur
    Conjur.org Conjur OSS Helm Chart Kubernetes Conjur Demo My GitHub repo with all the resources used in the post. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

StackRox mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of StackRox yet. Tracking of StackRox recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CyberArk Conjur and StackRox, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

SecretHub - SecretHub is a developer tool to help you keep database passwords, API tokens, and other secrets...

Lacework - Lacework is a highly trusted platform that provides security for Cloud Environments, DevOps, and Containers.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection - Symantec Cloud Workload Protection enables business agility and cost savings by automating security for public cloud workloads. Visit Symantec to learn more.