Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CyberArk Conjur VS Threat Stack

Compare CyberArk Conjur VS Threat Stack and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CyberArk Conjur logo CyberArk Conjur

Programmable open source interface that securely authenticates, controls and audits non-human access across tool stacks, apps, containers and cloud environments.

Threat Stack logo Threat Stack

Cloud Sights helps you protect your cloud infrastructure. Harden your servers against attacks, know what users are logged in and what they are doing, and be alerted of suspicious activity
  • CyberArk Conjur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-09
  • Threat Stack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-10

CyberArk Conjur features and specs

  • Strong Security Model
    CyberArk Conjur provides a robust security model with role-based access control and auditing to ensure that secrets are managed securely.
  • Cloud-native
    Conjur is built to integrate seamlessly with cloud environments, which makes it a good fit for organizations using modern cloud infrastructure and DevOps practices.
  • Ease of Integration
    It offers numerous integrations with platforms like Kubernetes, Ansible, and Jenkins, facilitating easy adoption in existing workflows and infrastructure.
  • Open Source Option
    Conjur offers an open-source version, allowing organizations to evaluate and customize the basic features according to their needs without initial licensing costs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    CyberArk Conjur provides detailed documentation and resources, which can help streamline the implementation and troubleshooting processes.

Possible disadvantages of CyberArk Conjur

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    Setting up Conjur within an existing infrastructure can be complex and may require specialized knowledge to configure correctly.
  • Cost
    While there is an open-source version available, the full suite and enterprise features of CyberArk Conjur can be expensive for some organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a steep learning curve due to the advanced security concepts and configurations involved.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a full-fledged Conjur system can require significant resources, which might be cumbersome for smaller setups or teams.
  • Limited Open-source Features
    The open-source version has limitations compared with the full enterprise product, potentially lacking some advanced features needed by larger organizations.

Threat Stack features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    Threat Stack provides full-stack security monitoring, offering visibility into cloud, container, and on-premises environments, which enables organizations to detect and respond to threats effectively.
  • Ease of Integration
    The platform integrates seamlessly with a variety of services and tools, making it easier for organizations to incorporate Threat Stack into their existing security workflows.
  • Real-time Alerts
    It offers real-time threat detection and alerting, allowing security teams to quickly respond to potential security issues as they arise.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale with cloud and hybrid environments, Threat Stack can accommodate growth and complex infrastructures without compromising on performance.
  • Compliance Support
    Threat Stack helps organizations meet compliance requirements (such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS) by providing the necessary tools, controls, and reporting capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Threat Stack

  • Cost
    The platform can be expensive, particularly for smaller organizations, which may find it challenging to justify the investment relative to their budget.
  • Complexity
    While feature-rich, the platform can be complex to set up and configure, possibly requiring dedicated resources or expertise to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a steep learning curve due to the comprehensive nature of the tool, necessitating time and training to become proficient with the platform.
  • False Positives
    Users have reported issues with false positives, which can lead to alert fatigue and the potential for critical alerts being overlooked.

CyberArk Conjur videos

+ Add

CyberArk Conjur CICD Demo

Threat Stack videos

+ Add

Threat Stack: Proactive Risk Identification and Real-time Threat Detection across AWS

More videos:

  • Review - Security Tested, Ops Approved: Log Management at Threat Stack | DZone.com Webinar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CyberArk Conjur and Threat Stack)

CyberArk Conjur

Threat Stack

Monitoring Tools
36 36%
Monitoring Tools
64% 64
Security
31 31%
Security
69% 69
Security & Privacy
37 37%
Security & Privacy
63% 63
Online Services
100 100%
Online Services
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CyberArk Conjur and Threat Stack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CyberArk Conjur should be more popular than Threat Stack. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CyberArk Conjur mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2021)
    CyberArk (Conjur team) | Mid-Snr Infrastructure Engineer | REMOTE OR NEWTON, MA | FULL-TIME The Conjur infrastructure team provides support and internal tooling to the product engineers working on Conjur and Conjur Enterprise as well as a suite of associated products and integrations. Our job is to make sure engineering has the tools and facilities available to do their jobs with minimal infra-related effort on... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Securing Kubernetes Secrets with Conjur
    Conjur.org Conjur OSS Helm Chart Kubernetes Conjur Demo My GitHub repo with all the resources used in the post. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Threat Stack mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2022)
    F5 / Threat Stack | Multiple Roles in Engineering | REMOTE (US) | Full-time | https://threatstack.com As Threat Stack, we built a cloud security platform to give our customers insight to what's going on inside their infrastructure. We ingest billions of events daily, make them available to customers in an accesible schemafied format, deliver alerts to customers when appropriate, and more. Last year we were... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CyberArk Conjur and Threat Stack, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Tenable.io - Tenable.io Cyber Exposure platform helps to protect any asset on any computing platform and eliminate blind spots.

SecretHub - SecretHub is a developer tool to help you keep database passwords, API tokens, and other secrets...

BreachLock - BreachLock is a versatile platform that provides scalable and smooth penetration testing services for vulnerabilities.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Loading...