Diffbot
import.io
Octoparse
Content Grabber
Apify
ParseHub
Kimono
Data Miner
Reviewable
Phabricator
Gerrit Code Review
Review Board
Trag
SonarQube
GitHub
BitBucket
Diffbot ReviewableBased on our record, Reviewable seems to be a lot more popular than Diffbot. While we know about 21 links to Reviewable, we've tracked only 1 mention of Diffbot. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I work in non-profit/social impact and I'm trying to get a snapshot of themes/issues that concern a subset of organizations (say a total of 500) in our network via news/articles that these orgs may have published or that these orgs may have been referenced in within the last 30-60 days. Using Diffbot (diffbot.com), I can get a list of articles, news, content etc. That relate to these orgs. Understandably, this... Source: almost 2 years ago
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
import.io - Import. io helps its users find the internet data they need, organize and store it, and transform it into a format that provides them with the context they need.
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
Octoparse - Octoparse provides easy web scraping for anyone. Our advanced web crawler, allows users to turn web pages into structured spreadsheets within clicks.
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
Content Grabber - Content Grabber is an automated web scraping tool.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes