Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Dollar Universe VS Control-M

Compare Dollar Universe VS Control-M and see what are their differences

Dollar Universe logo Dollar Universe

Dollar Universe Workload Automation (formerly CA Automic Dollar Universe) automates and optimize IT workload in high volume, hybrid, heterogeneous environments.

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • Dollar Universe Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-28
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

Dollar Universe features and specs

  • Scalability
    Dollar Universe is designed to handle complex and large-scale environments. It can manage thousands of jobs across different systems seamlessly, making it suitable for large enterprises.
  • Cross-Platform Capabilities
    Supports various platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix, enabling automation tasks across different environments without compatibility issues.
  • Reliable Automation
    Offers highly reliable job scheduling and automation, minimizing the risk of job failures and ensuring timely execution of critical tasks.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    Provides real-time monitoring of jobs and processes, allowing administrators to quickly identify and resolve issues, thus ensuring continuous business operations.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Offers strong integration options with other enterprise tools and applications, facilitating seamless workflows and data exchanges across various business processes.

Possible disadvantages of Dollar Universe

  • Complex Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring significant time and expertise to implement effectively, especially in large IT environments.
  • Licensing Costs
    The cost of licensing can be significant, which might be a consideration for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    The system can have a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating comprehensive training to fully utilize its capabilities.
  • Resource Intensive
    It might require considerable system resources for optimal performance, which could necessitate additional investment in hardware or infrastructure upgrades.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to some open-source solutions, there might be a smaller community base, which can limit the availability of community-driven support and resources.

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Dollar Universe videos

No Dollar Universe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Dollar Universe and Control-M)
Workflow Automation
10 10%
90% 90
IT Automation
8 8%
92% 92
Monitoring Tools
6 6%
94% 94
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Dollar Universe and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Dollar Universe and Control-M

Dollar Universe Reviews

We have no reviews of Dollar Universe yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Dollar Universe and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Apache Airflow - Airflow is a platform to programmaticaly author, schedule and monitor data pipelines.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions