Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Doom Emacs VS CudaText

Compare Doom Emacs VS CudaText and see what are their differences

Doom Emacs logo Doom Emacs

Emacs configuration similar to Spacemacs but faster and lighter.

CudaText logo CudaText

CudaText is a cross-platform text editor, written in Lazarus.
  • Doom Emacs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
  • CudaText Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-09

Doom Emacs videos

Doom Emacs - Getting Started

More videos:

  • Review - Doom Emacs For Noobs

CudaText videos

A tour of CudaText

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Doom Emacs and CudaText)
Text Editors
82 82%
18% 18
IDE
80 80%
20% 20
Software Development
67 67%
33% 33
Knowledge Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Doom Emacs and CudaText. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Doom Emacs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 155 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Doom Emacs mentions (155)

  • Helix-gpui: helix gpui front end
    Having used evil-mode as my main driver for years, I can confirm that it truly works as expected. Requires some setup though. I used https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs to do the heavy lifting though. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • M-X Reloaded: The Second Golden Age of Emacs – (Think)
    Yes, you need to install Emacs. It is probably available from whatever package manager your system uses. I prefer Doom (https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs) to Spacemacs. However I haven't looked at Spacemacs for many years; perhaps it's now on par with Doom. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • From Doom to Vanilla Emacs
    Ever since I've started my Emacs journey it seemed like the wholy grail to have your own (vanilla!) configuration without any hard dependencies on frameworks like Doom or Spacemacs. There are plenty of dotemacs configurations ouf there which can serve as a great source of inspiration. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Emacs 29.1 Released
    I am a long-time Emacs user and used to maintain my own config, but I switched to Doom Emacs [1] a year ago. Doom Emacs is like a pre-packaged/pre-configured emacs distro. You still need to configure the features that you want to use, but it's a lot easier (and faster) than having to do everything from scratch, and definitely if you already have some emacs background anyway. For me, it makes the newer, more... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Not trying to start a rumble, but why emacs
    Try an emacs distribution and see if you like it:https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs. Source: 12 months ago
View more

CudaText mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CudaText yet. Tracking of CudaText recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Doom Emacs and CudaText, you can also consider the following products

Evil - The extensible vi layer for Emacs.

Visual Studio Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

Org mode - Org: an Emacs Mode for Notes, Planning, and Authoring

Notepad++ - A free source code editor which supports several programming languages running under the MS Windows environment.

Neovim - Vim's rebirth for the 21st century

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing