Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Eddtor VS Trix

Compare Eddtor VS Trix and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Eddtor logo Eddtor

Sophisticated tool for simple writing. Beautiful. Yours.

Trix logo Trix

A rich text editor for everyday writing.
  • Eddtor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-08
  • Trix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-01

Eddtor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Eddtor offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features without a steep learning curve.
  • Collaboration Features
    The platform supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously, which enhances productivity and teamwork.
  • Versatile Templates
    Eddtor provides a wide range of templates that cater to different industries and use-cases, helping users get started quickly with pre-designed formats.
  • Cross-Platform Accessibility
    The service is accessible from various devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones, ensuring that users can work from anywhere.

Possible disadvantages of Eddtor

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other platforms, Eddtor may lack more advanced functionalities that power users or larger organizations might require.
  • Subscription Costs
    While it offers many free features, full access to all tools and capabilities might require a paid subscription, which could be a downside for budget-conscious users.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users might experience performance slowdowns or glitches, particularly during peak times or when handling large, complex projects.
  • Integration Limitations
    Eddtor might not integrate with as many third-party applications as some users would need, limiting its flexibility in certain environments.

Trix features and specs

  • User-friendly interface
    Trix offers a simple and clean interface that is easy to navigate for users of various skill levels, making it an accessible tool for content creation.
  • Rich text features
    The editor supports a variety of formatting options, including bold, italic, lists, links, and embedded content, providing flexibility in how text and media are presented.
  • Embedded multimedia
    Users can seamlessly insert images, videos, and other multimedia content directly into the text, enhancing the overall interactivity and engagement of the content.
  • Cross-browser compatibility
    Trix is designed to work consistently across different browsers, ensuring that the editing experience is uniform and reliable no matter what browser is being used.
  • Simplicity in integration
    Integrating Trix into web applications is straightforward with minimal configuration, reducing the time and effort required for setup.
  • Open-source
    As an open-source project, Trix allows developers to contribute to its improvement and adapt the software to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Trix

  • Limited customization
    While Trix is straightforward to use, it offers fewer customization options compared to other rich text editors, which may limit its adaptability for certain advanced use cases.
  • Basic feature set
    Some users might find Trix lacking in advanced features such as collaborative editing, markdown support, or real-time spell checking, which are available in other editors.
  • Dependency on server for processing
    Trix relies on server-side processing for embedding and saving data, which might increase complexity in terms of server configuration and handling.
  • Incomplete documentation
    While there is a documentation available, it may not cover all aspects or use cases in detail, potentially causing difficulties for developers during implementation.
  • Performance with large documents
    Trix can sometimes struggle with performance issues when handling very large documents, affecting the user experience during editing sessions.

Eddtor videos

No Eddtor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Trix videos

Trix has Fruity Shapes, AGAIN!

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Trix VS Trix
  • Review - Trix Trux Review: Does it Work? | As Seen on TV

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Eddtor and Trix)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
14 14%
86% 86
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
100% 100
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Eddtor and Trix. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Eddtor and Trix

Eddtor Reviews

We have no reviews of Eddtor yet.
Be the first one to post

Trix Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
If you want something different for a change, with the basic functionalities of a web editor, Trix can be a pick. The project describes that it is built for the modern web.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Trix seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Eddtor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Eddtor yet. Tracking of Eddtor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Trix mentions (14)

  • Word-like HTML inline edit with design mode
    I love how Trix [0] and (I think) ProseMirror [1] work in that regard: it does use contenteditable, but every edit you make is applied to an internal model instead, then the editor state is updated back from the model. [0]: https://trix-editor.org/ [1]: https://prosemirror.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Testing ViewComponent w/ Capybara
    💡 If you're using the Trix editor, I also show you how to test your view components with a nice helper inspired by Will Olson's article Testing the Trix Editor with Capybara and MiniTest. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Quill – Your powerful rich text editor
    Trix is simple and easy to use for basic writing like a blog. It’s what Basecamp and HEY both use (it was built by 37signals and is the default in Rails) https://trix-editor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • WYSIWYG editor for a new Rails project
    Trix was the winner. It was easy to style, is well maintained, has documentation for embedding it into a form, is easy to create custom keyboard shortcuts for, has great examples on how to save/load content or modify it with javascript. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How to use Cloudflare R2 with Ruby on Rails Active Storage
    In some case, you may need to allow the user to upload the file in the text editor like Trix editor. However, you current configuration not allowed it, you need to configure the CORS. Here the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Eddtor and Trix, you can also consider the following products

Writefull - Writefull provides you with the tools you need to improve the quality and consistency of your writing.

Cleartext - A text editor that allows only the 1,000 most common words

Write.as - Publish a thought in seconds

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Facebook Notes - Facebook launches a platform for writers and bloggers

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.