Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EJBCA VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Compare EJBCA VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and see what are their differences

EJBCA logo EJBCA

EJBCA® is a PKI Certificate Authority software, built using Java (JEE) technology.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.
  • EJBCA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

EJBCA features and specs

  • Open Source
    EJBCA is open-source, which means you can access, modify, and distribute the software freely. This leads to cost savings and the flexibility to customize the software to meet your specific needs.
  • Comprehensive Features
    EJBCA offers a comprehensive set of features for certificate management, including issuance, revocation, validation, and a wide range of PKI functions. This makes it suitable for various applications and industries.
  • Scalability
    EJBCA is designed to handle large deployments, making it suitable for enterprises or organizations with extensive PKI infrastructures and the need for handling numerous certificates.
  • Standards Compliance
    EJBCA complies with numerous industry standards like X.509, RFC 5280, and others, ensuring interoperability with other systems and adherence to accepted security protocols.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, EJBCA benefits from an active community of users and contributors who can offer support, share knowledge, and contribute to the continuous improvement of the software.

Possible disadvantages of EJBCA

  • Complexity
    EJBCA's comprehensive feature set and flexibility can result in a steep learning curve for new users, requiring a deep understanding of PKI concepts and the software itself.
  • Resource Intensive
    Setting up and maintaining an EJBCA deployment can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient hardware and skilled personnel to manage and optimize the system.
  • Limited User Interface
    The user interface of EJBCA may not be as polished or intuitive as some commercial CA solutions, potentially making administration tasks more challenging for less technical users.
  • Support and Documentation
    While there is community support, the quality and availability of official documentation and professional support might be less comprehensive compared to commercial software with dedicated support teams.
  • Initial Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of EJBCA can be complex and time-consuming, necessitating careful planning and execution to ensure that security and operational needs are met.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

EJBCA videos

How to integrate PrimeKey EJBCA Enterprise with Luna SA for Government HSM

More videos:

  • Review - EJBCA Installation in Ubuntu Linux

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EJBCA and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication)
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
Password Management
100 100%
0% 0
Two Factor Authentication

User comments

Share your experience with using EJBCA and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EJBCA mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of EJBCA yet. Tracking of EJBCA recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EJBCA and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, you can also consider the following products

OpenXPKI - OpenXPKI is a software stack that provides all necessary components to manage keys and certificates...

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

TinyCA - TinyCA is a simple graphical userinterface written in Perl/Gtk to manage a small CA (Certification...

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Vault by HashiCorp - Tool for managing secrets

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.