Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Epsagon VS Warp

Compare Epsagon VS Warp and see what are their differences

Epsagon logo Epsagon

Track costs and fix your serverless application.

Warp logo Warp

Warp (Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform) is a high-speed software rasterizer tool designed for the accurate reproduction of bitmap graphics on modern microprocessor-based systems.
  • Epsagon Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-18
  • Warp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28

Epsagon videos

[Webinar] Managing Observability in Modern Applications | Epsagon-CNCF

More videos:

  • Review - AWS and Epsagon: Serverless Observability Workshop
  • Review - [Webinar] AWS and Epsagon: Serverless Observability

Warp videos

A Review of Warp. The Best Terminal Ever, I'm Never Going Back to Hyper

More videos:

  • Review - Warp Review
  • Review - A free VPN you can trust — Cloudflare Warp

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Epsagon and Warp)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Communication
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Epsagon and Warp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Warp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Epsagon mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Epsagon yet. Tracking of Epsagon recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Warp mentions (4)

  • Nvidia Warp: A Python framework for high performance GPU simulation and graphics
    Not to mention DirectX WARP https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/direct3darticles/directx-warp. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • Implementing a GPU's Programming Model on a CPU
    In addition to ISPC, some of this is also done in software fallback implementations of GPU APIs. In the open source world we have SwiftShader and Lavapipe, and on Windows we have WARP[1]. It's sad to me that Larrabee didn't catch on, as that might have been a path to a good parallel computer, one that has efficient parallel throughput like a GPU, but also agility more like a CPU, so you don't need to batch things... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Why is every graphics API C# wrapper I find deprecated?
    If you select a WARP driver it should "theoretically work". But there are some limits with the WARP devices (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/direct3darticles/directx-warp). Source: over 1 year ago
  • Any resources for graphics programming on the CPU?
    If you use D3D11 or D3D12, those come with a software rasterizer by default so you can do graphics programming even without a GPU. It's called WARP and it's what Windows uses to e.g. Render the desktop and stuff before you install your graphics drivers. Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Epsagon and Warp, you can also consider the following products

KintoHub - A modern fullstack app platform

Teleconsole - Teleconsole is a free service to share your terminal session with people you trust.

Lumigo - With one-click distributed tracing, Lumigo lets developers effortlessly find and fix issues in serverless and microservices environments.

Gotty - GoTTY is a simple command line tool that turns your CLI tools into web applications.

Dashbird - End-to-end observability & debugging platform for serverless applications.

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.