Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Errbit VS AirBrake

Compare Errbit VS AirBrake and see what are their differences

Errbit logo Errbit

The open source error catcher that's Airbrake API compliant

AirBrake logo AirBrake

Airbrake is the leading exception reporting service, currently providing error tracking.
  • Errbit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • AirBrake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-17

AirBrake

$ Details
paid Free Trial $19.0 / Monthly (25K errors per month)

Errbit features and specs

  • Open Source
    Errbit is an open-source error tracking tool, which means users can access the source code, modify it, and contribute to it. This allows for customization and flexibility to suit specific needs.
  • Self-hosted
    With Errbit, users can self-host their error tracking system, providing full control over data management, security, and infrastructure.
  • Integrations
    Errbit supports integrations with various applications such as GitHub, allowing teams to streamline their error management workflows.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, Errbit has a community of users and contributors who can offer support, share customizations, and provide updates.
  • Cost-effective
    Since it is open-source, using Errbit can be more cost-effective for organizations than proprietary solutions, especially for those who prefer an in-house IT infrastructure.

Possible disadvantages of Errbit

  • Setup Complexity
    Setting up Errbit requires technical knowledge and effort, including server setup and maintenance, which may not be ideal for all teams.
  • Maintenance Required
    As a self-hosted solution, Errbit requires ongoing maintenance and updates, which could add to the workload of the IT team.
  • Limited Features Compared to Commercial Solutions
    Errbit may lack some advanced features and integrations that are available in commercial error tracking solutions.
  • Scale Challenges
    For very large-scale applications with a high volume of errors, managing and scaling Errbit might become challenging without significant infrastructure.
  • User Interface
    The user interface of Errbit might not be as polished or user-friendly as some commercial alternatives, potentially affecting usability.

AirBrake features and specs

  • Error Monitoring
    AirBrake provides comprehensive error monitoring for web applications, helping developers quickly identify and fix bugs. It automatically captures exceptions and provides detailed reports, improving the debugging process.
  • Integration
    AirBrake supports integration with various development tools such as GitHub, Jira, Slack, and more. This allows for seamless workflow management and collaboration between team members.
  • Real-Time Notifications
    AirBrake offers real-time notifications for errors via email, Slack, or other communication tools, ensuring that developers are immediately informed of any issues, thus minimizing downtime and improving responsiveness.
  • Detailed Reports
    AirBrake provides detailed error reports, including stack traces, environment information, and user context. This in-depth data aids in swiftly understanding the root cause of issues.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform has an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible for developers of all expertise levels to navigate and utilize effectively.

Possible disadvantages of AirBrake

  • Cost
    AirBrake can be expensive, especially for small teams or startups. The cost may add up quickly as the number of applications or error occurrences increases.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan is quite limited in its features and capabilities, which can restrict its usability for developers who do not opt for a paid plan.
  • Customization
    Some users may find the customization options to be lacking compared to other error monitoring tools, limiting their ability to tailor alerts and reports to specific needs.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there can be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all the features and integrations AirBrake offers.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, integrating AirBrake may introduce a slight performance overhead to the monitored applications, which could be a concern for performance-critical environments.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Errbit and AirBrake)
Error Tracking
18 18%
82% 82
Crash Reporting
27 27%
73% 73
Exception Monitoring
20 20%
80% 80
Bug Trackers
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Errbit and AirBrake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Errbit and AirBrake

Errbit Reviews

We have no reviews of Errbit yet.
Be the first one to post

AirBrake Reviews

6 Bugsnag Alternatives to Consider in 2021
Airbrake can discover and report exceptions and other code issues automatically. Using Airbrake, you can quickly organize errors and events into various categories. This error grouping feature is one of the most in-demand features among error management tools and is unique to Airbrake. You can choose and design your list of categories and instruct Airbrake to classify...
Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AirBrake should be more popular than Errbit. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Errbit mentions (1)

  • local error monitoring ?
    Are you looking for a self-hosted solution? There's Errbit (https://errbit.com/), an open source Airbrake-compatible system. Source: over 3 years ago

AirBrake mentions (2)

  • How to Setup a Project That Can Host Up to 1000 Users for Free
    The Rollbar’s ancestor, Airbrake, is another good choice (if you can afford it, because it has no free plan). You can see a detailed comparison between these two here: https://rollbar.com/vs/airbrake/. The same applies to Honeybadger — one more popular modern error management service for rails. In a nutshell, they do similar things but may have different bells and whistles. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Airbrake.io in apps
    How is the functionality of airbrake.io in apps? Looking to switch from crashlytics. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Errbit and AirBrake, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

BugSnag - Not all bugs are worth fixing. Prioritize and fix software bugs that matter while improving software stability with every release.

Raygun - Raygun gives developers meaningful insights into problems affecting their applications. Discover issues - Understand the problem - Fix things faster.

HoneyBadger - Exception, uptime, and performance monitoring for Ruby.

TrackJS - JavaScript Error Tracking for Modern Web Applications