Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FeaturePeek VS Runnable

Compare FeaturePeek VS Runnable and see what are their differences

FeaturePeek logo FeaturePeek

Collaborate on in-progress website implementations. FeaturePeek allows your team to collect feedback on your front-end during the implementation phase of development.

Runnable logo Runnable

We're thrilled to announce the Runnable team is joining MuleSoft.
  • FeaturePeek Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-09
  • Runnable Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19

FeaturePeek features and specs

  • Live Preview Environments
    FeaturePeek provides live preview environments for pull requests, which allows developers and stakeholders to view changes in a realistic environment before merging.
  • Streamlined Collaboration
    The platform facilitates collaboration across teams by allowing feedback right in the context of the code changes, simplifying communication between developers and non-technical stakeholders.
  • Ease of Use
    FeaturePeek is user-friendly and integrates effortlessly with existing workflows and tools, providing a straightforward setup process.
  • Improved Feedback Loop
    By providing a visual representation of changes, FeaturePeek accelerates the feedback loop, ensuring that issues are detected and discussed earlier in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Tools
    FeaturePeek integrates with popular development tools like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, enhancing its utility within existing development pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of FeaturePeek

  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud service, FeaturePeek requires a stable internet connection, which might be a limitation for some developers working in offline environments.
  • Limited Offline Support
    FeaturePeek does not offer offline support, which could be problematic for users needing access to their previews in environments with limited connectivity.
  • Potential for Increased Costs
    Using an additional tool like FeaturePeek may involve extra costs, which can add up for teams or organizations with tight budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Although generally user-friendly, some team members might require time to fully understand and leverage the platform's functionalities effectively.
  • Integration Complexity
    While FeaturePeek integrates with various tools, setting up these integrations can sometimes be complex depending on the specific configurations and workflows of a team.

Runnable features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Runnable provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of setting up, deploying, and managing containerized applications.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The platform allows developers to quickly spin up development environments, enabling faster prototyping and testing of new features.
  • Isolation of Environments
    Runnable enables the creation of isolated environments, which helps in preventing conflicts between different development stages and versions.
  • Integration
    Runnable offers seamless integration with various CI/CD tools and version control systems like GitHub, which enhances the development workflow.
  • Collaboration
    The platform supports collaborative work among development teams, allowing for shared environments and easier team collaboration.

Possible disadvantages of Runnable

  • Learning Curve
    Although designed to be user-friendly, new users might still face a learning curve when familiarizing themselves with the platform's features and functionality.
  • Resource Limitations
    Platform constraints in terms of available resources might limit the ability to fully scale or test resource-intensive applications efficiently.
  • Cost
    Depending on usage patterns and required features, cost can be a potential issue for smaller teams or startups operating on limited budgets.
  • Performance
    The reliance on shared platform infrastructure may lead to potential performance bottlenecks, especially under high load or complex testing scenarios.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Excessive reliance on a specific platform for development environments might lead to challenges if a change in service or discontinuation occurs.

FeaturePeek videos

FeaturePeek Product Walkthrough

More videos:

  • Review - What is FeaturePeek?
  • Review - FeaturePeek. Deployment Previews for Teams.

Runnable videos

No Runnable videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FeaturePeek and Runnable)
Web Development Tools
66 66%
34% 34
Developer Tools
38 38%
62% 62
Visual Feeback
100 100%
0% 0
Visual Bug Reports
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FeaturePeek and Runnable. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FeaturePeek and Runnable, you can also consider the following products

TrackDuck - Visual feedback for web design and development.

Now + Github - Deploy your apps from GitHub pull requests as you push!

Valist - Automatically created staging environments for every update with a shareable link for testing

RainforestQA - Insanely simple testing. Create tests for your website in plain English, then run them across all major browsers with a single click. Powered by human intelligence

Usersnap - Usersnap is a customer feedback software for SaaS companies that need to constantly improve and grow their products.

Marker.io - Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites