Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FeedDeck VS Apache Tapestry

Compare FeedDeck VS Apache Tapestry and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FeedDeck logo FeedDeck

FeedDeck is an open source RSS and social media feed reader, inspired by TweetDeck. FeedDeck allows you to follow your favorite feeds in one place on all platforms.

Apache Tapestry logo Apache Tapestry

Apache Tapestry is a programming environment designed to enhance Java scripting. It's produced by Apache Software Foundation, which was founded in 1999 in Maryland. Read more about Apache Tapestry.
  • FeedDeck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-03-24
  • Apache Tapestry Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22

FeedDeck features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Tapestry features and specs

  • Component-Based Design
    Apache Tapestry offers a component-based architecture, which promotes reusable and modular code, making it easier to manage and maintain complex web applications.
  • Convention Over Configuration
    Tapestry reduces the need for extensive configuration files, allowing for a more streamlined development process by using sensible defaults and conventions.
  • Built-in Scalability
    The framework is designed to handle scalability concerns efficiently, providing features like built-in data caching and optimized rendering to support high-performance applications.
  • Live Class Reloading
    Tapestry enables developers to see changes instantly without restarting the server, thanks to its live class reloading feature, which accelerates the development cycle.
  • Robust Community and Documentation
    With an active community and comprehensive documentation, developers can find support and resources easily, which can aid in efficient problem-solving and learning.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Tapestry

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might experience a steep learning curve due to the framework's unique concepts and paradigms, which may differ significantly from more mainstream technologies.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to some other web frameworks, Tapestry has a smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions, which might limit some functionality and tool integration.
  • Fewer Resources and Examples
    Due to its less widespread use, there are fewer tutorials, examples, and stack overflow questions answered, which can be a challenge for newcomers or when encountering specific issues.
  • Limited IDE Support
    While most major IDEs support Tapestry, the support might not be as robust or feature-rich as with more popular frameworks, potentially affecting productivity.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Tapestry may not receive updates and new features as frequently as other more actively developed frameworks, which can slow down the adoption of new web technologies.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FeedDeck and Apache Tapestry)

FeedDeck

Apache Tapestry

Insight Management
100 100%
Insight Management
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
RSS Reader
100 100%
RSS Reader
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FeedDeck and Apache Tapestry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FeedDeck and Apache Tapestry

FeedDeck Reviews

We have no reviews of FeedDeck yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache Tapestry Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
You can write Tapestry pages and components as plain old Java objects (POJOs), so you can access the entire Java ecosystem from the framework. Besides Java, Tapestry also supports the Groovy and Scala programming languages and integrates with other Java frameworks such as Hibernate and Spring. Tapestry has been built with performance in mind; therefore it provides you with...
Source: raygun.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Tapestry seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FeedDeck mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FeedDeck yet. Tracking of FeedDeck recommendations started around Mar 2025.

Apache Tapestry mentions (1)

  • Why is Java templating/server rendering losing ground?
    Or good old https://tapestry.apache.org/. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FeedDeck and Apache Tapestry, you can also consider the following products

Feedly - The content you need to accelerate your research, marketing, and sales.

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

Inoreader - Dive into your favorite content. The content reader for power users who want to save time.

Apache Wicket - HelloWorld demonstrates the basic structure of a web application in Wicket. A Label component is used to display a message on the home page for the application. In all the Wicket examples, you have to put all files in the same package directory.

FreshRSS - FreshRSS is a free, self-hosted RSS aggregator.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Loading...