The way to value stocks is by running a DCF analysis. There's software that can do that for you, for example at: finbox.com. In a DCF analysis you have to come up with some estimates with regards to future revenue, capex, depreciation, EBITDA margins, and other things like that. Then, based on these estimates and your desired rate of return, the DCF model should tell you how much the company is worth today. Source: over 1 year ago

The bond market is twice the size of the equity market, but it's more opaque. I'm looking for some kind of dashboard, like Wallmine, Finbox, Trading Economics, or Messari, for real-time capital flows through Treasurys, bonds, credit markets, and the like. Any good resources out there? Also, anything good on private markets as well (VC, PE, etc.)? Source: about 2 years ago

I know finbox.com got this $10k grant but never did YC itself. Source: over 2 years ago

How good is finbox.com? The models you can choose from are already filled up. Is that data I can rely on? Source: over 3 years ago

I made this data visualisation in Adobe After Effects. I download the stock information from Finbox (https://finbox.com) and created json file with it. I linked this data file to the animation using Javascript. Source: over 3 years ago

From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago

According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago

We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: almost 3 years ago

> Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: over 3 years ago