Is the objective to get inside a container to do dev stuff? Reminds me of https://www.jetify.com/devbox and https://flox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

I think it's a bad addition since it pushes people towards a worse solution to a common problem. Using "go tool" forces you to have a bunch of dependencies in your go.mod that can conflict with your software's real dependency requirements, when there's zero reason those matter. You shouldn't have to care if one of your developer tools depends on a different version of a library than you. It makes it so the tools... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

I think that's a bit reductive, but I get the intent. A lot of people see systemic problems in their development and turn to tools to reduce the cognitive load, busywork, or just otherwise automate a solution. For example "we always argue over formatting" -> use an automated formatter. That makes total sense as long as managing/interacting with the tool is less work, not just different work. With Nix I still think... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Try flox [0]. It's an imperative frontend for Nix that I've been using. I don't know how to use nix-shell/flakes or whatever it is they do now, but flox makes it easy to just install stuff. [0]: https://flox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

If you like NixOs and virtual development environments, perhaps try https://www.jetify.com/devbox or https://flox.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Many companies that depend on OSS contribute financially so that the projects remain robust. Examples like Google and Microsoft have shown that corporate sponsorship is not only beneficial for maintainers but also for companies that rely on reliable software. The corporate sponsorship model moves away from traditional ad-based revenue generation, fostering a direct relationship between the sponsor and the... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

Similarly, open source projects, which are the backbone of digital infrastructure, have long struggled to achieve sustainable funding. Crowdfunding platforms such as Kickstarter, Opencollective, and corporate sponsorships from technology giants like Google’s open source initiatives and Microsoft’s commitment to open source are now offering viable alternatives. Innovators have begun to integrate Non-Fungible Tokens... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

Governments, academic institutions, and major tech companies like Microsoft and Google have recognized the importance of financial support. Funding models have evolved to include corporate sponsorships, grants (e.g., Mozilla's Open Source Support Program), and community-driven donations through platforms like GitHub Sponsors and Open Collective. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago

Sponsorship Programs: Platforms such as GitHub Sponsors and offerings from tech giants like Google Open Source and Microsoft Open Source provide recurring support while maintaining community values. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

As digital economies matured, the limitations of relying solely on volunteer support became apparent. Numerous OSS projects found that a lack of steady revenue streams led to developer burnout, limited maintenance, and even stagnation. Today, the OSS landscape has evolved to incorporate a blend of funding methods that include individual donations for open source projects, crowdfunding via platforms like GitHub... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago