Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FV Player VS MediaElement.js

Compare FV Player VS MediaElement.js and see what are their differences

FV Player logo FV Player

WordPress's most reliable, easy to use and feature-rich video player.

MediaElement.js logo MediaElement.js

MediaElement.js provides HTML5 audio and video players in pure HTML and CSS.
  • FV Player Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-16
  • MediaElement.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

FV Player features and specs

  • Customizability
    FV Player offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to adjust the player to fit the design of their site and meet specific functional requirements.
  • Responsive Design
    The player is responsive and works well on different devices and screen sizes, enhancing the viewing experience for users on mobile, tablets, and desktops.
  • Compatibility
    FV Player is compatible with various video formats and platforms, including YouTube and Vimeo, allowing for versatile video content management.
  • Security Features
    Provides advanced security options like domain locking and HLS encryption to protect video content.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Possesses an intuitive and easy-to-use interface which makes it accessible for users with different skill levels.

Possible disadvantages of FV Player

  • Cost
    The premium features of FV Player require a paid license, which might be a disadvantage for those with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, beginners might face a learning curve when trying to use some of the more advanced features.
  • Limited Support for Free Version
    Free users might find the support options limited compared to those available for premium users.
  • Potential Performance Issues
    On very high-traffic websites, users might experience performance issues as the player could demand significant server resources.

MediaElement.js features and specs

  • Cross-browser compatibility
    MediaElement.js is designed to work across all major web browsers, providing a consistent media experience regardless of the user's browser.
  • HTML5 and Flash support
    It supports both HTML5 and Flash, ensuring media plays even on older browsers that do not support HTML5.
  • Customizable
    It offers various options for customization, allowing developers to tailor the media player to fit the design and functionality needs of their website.
  • Accessibility
    The player is designed with accessibility in mind, featuring support for screen readers and keyboard navigation.
  • Extensible
    It supports plugins, making it easier for developers to extend functionality as needed.
  • Playlist support
    It has built-in support for playlists, making it easier to manage and play a sequence of media files.
  • Consistent API
    Provides a consistent API for media playback, which simplifies the process of media integration for developers.

Possible disadvantages of MediaElement.js

  • Dependency on Flash
    While it provides fallback to Flash, this can be seen as a downside since Flash is becoming obsolete and presents security vulnerabilities.
  • Performance
    Depending on the complexity and number of media elements, performance can be an issue, especially on resource-constrained devices.
  • Size
    The library can be relatively large compared to other media players, which can affect load times and overall performance of web applications.
  • Complexity
    Though customizable, the process can be complex for developers who are not familiar with JavaScript and the library's configuration options.
  • Limited advanced features
    While it covers basic needs well, it may not have advanced features out-of-the-box that other specialized media players provide.

FV Player videos

No FV Player videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

MediaElement.js videos

youtube

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FV Player and MediaElement.js)
YouTube Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Marketing Platform
50 50%
50% 50
Video Platform
43 43%
57% 57
Media Player
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using FV Player and MediaElement.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FV Player seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FV Player mentions (1)

  • Wordpress Video plug in advice
    Alternatively, if this isn't doable relatively easily, perhaps the ability to stop the first video and manually start the second video at the same place the first video was recently started. I was told that Foliovision FV player may do this but I'm not sure exactly what feature to look for or which version I'd need. Thanks. Source: almost 3 years ago

MediaElement.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MediaElement.js yet. Tracking of MediaElement.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FV Player and MediaElement.js, you can also consider the following products

VideoJS - VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...

JW Player - JW Player is an embeddable media player.

Flowplayer - Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

Able Player - Able Player is a fully accessible cross-browser media player.

SublimeVideo - The HTML5 Video Player Everyone Deserves.